单项选择题

听力原文:A militant Kurdish group has claimed responsibility for an explosion in Turkey's commercial capital Istanbul that wounded 17 peoplE.The group known as the Kurdistan Freedom Falcons reportedly carried out the attack to protest detention conditions of a Kurdish rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan. The blast took place in an Internet Care frequented by police in Istanbul's Bayrampasa District. Police officers were reportedly among the injureD.The Freedom Falcons has been blamed for a series of attacks against civilians in Turkey last year, including a blast on board a minibus in the Aegean coastal resort of Kusadasi. Two foreign tourists were killed in that attack. The Falcons are believed to be the guerrilla arm of the outlawed Kurdistan Worker's Party. But it has been fighting for Kurdish autonomy in the country's predominantly Kardish southeast region since 1984.
The Kurdistan Freedom Falcons carried out an explosion in Istanbul because they were
A.willing to resume its armed campaign against the Turkish government.
B.anxious to prevent a rebel leader from being sentenced to death.
C.dissatisfied with detention conditions of a Kurdish rebel leader.
D.eager to declare a unilateral fire and attack Turkish civilians.

A.The
B.
The
C.willing
D.
B.anxious
E.
C.dissatisfied
F.
D.eager
G.
热门 试题

单项选择题
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the Middle Ages, wealth and technology developed slowly indeeD.Medieval historians tell of the centuries it took for key inventions like the watermill or the heavy plow to diffuse across the landscapE.During this period, increases in technology led to increases in the population, with little if any appearing as an improvement in the median standard of living.Even the first century of the industrial revolution produced more 'improvements' than 'revolutions' in standards of living. With the railroad and the spinning and weaving of textiles as important exceptions, most innovations of that period were innovations in how goods were produced and transported, and in new kinds of capital, but not in consumer goods. Standards of living improved but styles of life remained much the samE.The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries saw a faster and different kind of changE.For the first time, technological capability outran population growth and natural resource scarcity. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the typical inhabitant of the leading economies—a British, a Belgian, an American, or an Australian had perhaps three times the standard of living of someone in a pre-industrial economy.Still, so slow was the pace of change that people, or at least aristocratic intellectuals, could think of their predecessors of some two thousand years before as effectively their contemporaries. Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman aristocrat and politician, might have felt more or less at home in the company of Thomas Jefferson. The plows were better in Jefferson's timE.Sailing ships were much improveD.However, these might have been insufficient to create a sense of a qualitative change in the order of life for the elitE.Moreover, being a slave of Jefferson was probably a lot like being a slave of Cicero.So slow was the pace of change that intellectuals in the early nineteenth century debated whether the industrial revolution was worthwhile, whether it was an improvement or a degeneration in the standard of living. Opinions were genuinely divided, with as optimistic a liberal as John Stuart Mill coming down on the 'pessimist' side as late as the end of the 1840s.In the twentieth century, however, standards of living explodeD.In the twentieth century, the magnitude of the growth in material wealth has been so great as to make it nearly impossible to measurE.Consider a sample of consumer goods available through Montgomery Ward in 1895 when a one-speed bicycle cost $65. Since then, the price of a bicycle measured in 'nominal' dollars has more than doubled (as a result of inflation). Today, the bicycle is much less expensive in terms of the measure that truly counts, its 'real' price: the work and sweat needed to earn its east. In 1895, it took perhaps 260 hours' worth of the average American worker's production to amass enough money to buy a one-speed bicyclE.Today an average American worker can buy one—and of higher quality—for less than 8 hours worth of production.On the bicycle standard (measuring wealth by counting up how many bicycles the labor can buy) the average American worker today is 36 times richer than his or her counterpart was in 1895. Other commodities would tell a different story. An office chair has become 12.5 times cheaper in terms of the time it takes the average worker to produce enough to pay for it. A Steinway piano or an accordion is only twice as cheap. A silver teaspoon is 25 percent more expensivE.Thus the answer to the question 'How much wealthier are we today than our counterparts of a century ago?' depends on which commodities you view as important. For many personal services—having a butler to answer the door and polish your silver spoons—you would find little difference in average wealth between 1895 and 1990: anA.believed that they were very much the same as their equals some two thousand years beforE.B.probably thought that great changes had occurred since Cicero.C.felt that qualitative changes had occurred in the last two thousand years.D.believed in the efficacy of slavery.
A.B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.5
H.
I.believed
J.
B.probably
K.
C.felt
L.
D.believed
M.
单项选择题
Early that June Pins XII secretly addressed the Sacred College of Cardinals on the extermination of the Jews. 'Every word we address to the competent authority on this subject, and all our public utterances,' he said in explanation of his reluctance to express more open condemnation, 'have to be carefully weighed and measured by us in the interest of the victims themselves, lest, contrary to our intentions, we make their situation worse and harder to bear.' He did not add that another reason for proceeding cautiously was that he regarded Bolshevism as a far greater danger than Nazism.The position of the Holy Sea was deplorable but it was an offense of omission rather than commission. The Church, under the Pope's guidance, had already saved the lives of more Jews than all other churches, religious institutions, and rescue organizations combined, and was presently hiding thousands of Jews in monasteries, convents, and Vatican City itselF.The record of the Allies was far more shameful. The British and Americans, despite lofty pronouncements, had not only avoided taking any meaningful action but gave sanctuary to few persecuted Jews. The Moscow Declaration of that year—signed by Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin—methodically listed Hitler's victims as Polish, Italian, French, Dutch, Belgian, Norwegian, Soviet, and Cretan. The curious omission of Jews (a policy emulated by the U. S. Office of War Information) was protested vehemently but uselessly by the World Jewish Congress. By the simple expedient of converting the Jews of Poland into Poles, and so on, the Final Solution was lost in the Big Three's general classification of Nazi terrorism.Contrasting with their reluctance to face the issue of systematic Jewish extermination was the forthrightness and courage of the Danes, who defied German occupation by transporting to Sweden almost every one of their 6,500 Jews; of the Finns, allies of Hitler, who saved all but four of their 4,000 Jews; and of the Japanese, another ally, who provided refuge in Manchuria for some 5,000 wandering European Jews in recognition of financial aid given by the Jewish firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Company during the Russian-Japanese War of 1904~1905.'We, Our,' and 'Us' in the first paragraph refer to ______.A.Pius XII himselF.B.Pius XII and the College of Cardinals.C.an unknown group.D.something that cannot be determined by the text.
A.'
B.
C.
D.
'We,
E.
A.Pius
F.
B.Pius
G.
C.an
H.
D.something
I.