TEXT D "There are too many
students overcrowding courses and contributing nothing to society," says
Professor Edward Mishan, explaining the subject of an article, published
recently in an economics journal. Using pure economic
rationality, Professor Mishan argues that subsidizing students because they
benefit society is a fallacy--one that he says he would have included in his
book 21 Popular Economic Fallacies, had he thought of it when it was first
published in 1970. "For if higher education is free," he writes,
"a man who chooses to spend three years at university rather than enter the
workforce may be willing to do so even though it makes no perceptible difference
to his future earnings." As such he advocates full commercial
rates on loans for students to pay the entire costs of their higher
education.. Professor Mandy Telford is not amused. "There is no
doubt that charging commercial interest rates on loans would put people off
going to university," she said. "At present we have a system
where the poorest students are forced to work long hours just to keep their
heads above water, while the rich, supported by their parents, are able to make
greater use of their time. Commercial rate loans would hit the poorest students
the hardest as they would be forced to borrow the most. After graduation all
students would be forced to chase a fast buck to escape the burden of their
ever-increasing debts, therefore shunning lower paid jobs in a public sector
that is crying out for skilled teachers and nurses, "Ms. Telford
added. One effect of subsidizing university studies, claims
Professor Mishan, is that "bizarre and outlandish" courses are likely to
proliferate. "In some courses (possibly medicine, electrical
engineering and accounting), the respective IRRs (internal rate of return) may
be well above that on commercial investment, whereas in others (possibly
psychology, sociology and gender studies), they would be well below," he
writes. On psychology, sociology, and gender studies, he says,
"you learn a few terms you throw into a conversation but nothing more, this is
not a good allocation of resources." Lynne Segal, professor of
psychology and gender studies at Birkbeck College, is nearly amused. "This is
amazing. All we hear about is people complaining about boys and
masculinity--lower exam results, more crime," she said. "Mental
illness amongst men is rising and depression these are economic issues as well.
He seems to be negating the study of human behaviour. It’s a bit hard to
take seriously," she added. Professor Mishan was a professor of
economics at London School of Economics until 1977, after which he moved to
America. Since then he has been "a little bit out of economics",
says professor Colin Robinson, editor of economic affairs, the
journal produced by the Institute of Economic Affairs, which published the
paper. But Professor Mishan does sound amused about his paper.
This is not my field of competence--it’s just bit of fun," he reassures
us. Professor Mishan advocates full commercial rates on students loans because he believes that______.
A.subsidized students may benefit society B.with free higher education, students may become more willing to enter the workforce C.students may overcrowd some courses and be unwilling to take other courses D.subsidizing is a good way to assign resources