TEXT D
Packaging It is said that the public and Congressional
concern about deceptive packaging rumpus started because Senator Hart discovered
that the boxes of cereals consumed by him, Mrs. Hart. and their children were
be- coming higher and narrower, with a decline of net weight from 12 to 10.5
ounces. without any reduction in price. There were still twelve biscuits, but
they had been reduced in size. Later. the senator rightly complained of a store
- bought pie in a handsomely illustrated box that pictured. in a single slice,
almost as many cherries as there were in tile whole pie. The
manufacturer who increases the unit price of his product by changing his package
size to lower the quantity delivered can, without undue hardship, put his
product into boxes, bags. and tins that will contain even 4 - ounce, 8 - ounce,
one - pound, and two - pound quantities of breakfast foods, cake mixes, etc. A
study of drugstore and supermarket shelves will convince any observer that all
possible sizes and shapes of boxes, jars, bottles, and tins are in use at the
same time and, as the package journals show. week by week. there is never any
hesitation in introducing a new size and shape of box or bottle when it aids in
product differentiation. The producers of packaged products argue strongly
against changing sizes of packages to contain even weights and volumes, but no
one in the trade comments unfavorably on the huge costs incurred by end- less
changes of package sizes, materials, shape, art work, and net weights that are
used for improving a product’ s market position. When a
packaging expert explained that he was able to multiply the price of hard sweets
by 2.5. from I dollar to 250 dollars by changing to a fancy jar, or that he had
made a 5 - ounce bottle look as though it held 8 ounces, he was in effect
telling the public that packaging can be a very. expensive luxury. It evidently
does come high, when an average family pays about 200 dollars a year for
bottles, cans, boxes, jars, and other containers, most of which can’ t be used
for anything but stuffing the garbage can. The author is critical mainly of ______.
A.inferior packaging B.the changes in package size C.exaggerated illustrations on packages D.dishonest packaging