未分类题

听力原文：W: Hmm, Hi.
M: Hi. I'm going door to door tonight to (22) tell people about the student action coalition. Do you have a few minutes?
W: SurE.(22) You know I think I read something in the newspaper last week.
M: Yeah. There was an article about this in the last issuE.See, (23) we're trying to protect and conserve some of the open spaces on campus.
W: That's right. You are the group that's opposing the extension of the parking lot next to Swing Hall, right?
M: That's us. We must feel that it's important to save some of the natural beauty of the campus, like over-by Swing. Some of those trees are hundreds of years olD.
W: It is a pretty spot. My friends and I have had picnics over there by the creek.
M: Then you understand how we feel. We're organizing a rally on Thursday afternoon to get the administration to reconsider the parking lot plan.
W: Well, (24) I have a class on Thursday afternoon.
M: (25) But maybe you could sign this petition? We're going to submit it to the administration to demonstrate how the students feel about this.
W: (25) Sure, let me get a pen and I'll sign it.
M: I have a pen right herE.And let me leave you this pamphlet about the student action coalition. Maybe you could come to some of our meeting. We get together once a month.
W: Yeah. I'd like to know more about your group. Let me know when the next meeting is and I'll try to be therE.
(23)
A.She saw them protesting.
B.She read about them in the newspaper.
C.She attended one of their meetings.
D.Her roommate is a member.

A.M:
B.
M:
C.
W:
D.
W:
E.
M:
F.
W:
G.
M:
H.
W:
I.
M:
J.
W:
K.
(23)
A.She
L.
B.She
M.
C.She
N.
D.Her

【参考答案】

B
解析：男士说他要向同学们介绍学生联盟(student action coalition)，女士说她上周在报纸......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)

<上一题目录下一题>

热门试题

未分类题

听力原文： How might you drag a good writer's work down to the lower level? Try the spell-check button. A study at the University of Pittsburgh indicates spell-check software may level the playing field between people with differing levels of language skills. hampering the work of writers and editors who place too much trust in the softwarE.(33)In the study, 33 undergraduate students were asked to proofread a one-page business letter—half of them using Microsoft Word with its red and green lines underlining potential errors. The other half did it in the old-fashioned way, using only their heads. (34)Without grammar or spelling software, students with higher SAT verbal scores made, on average, five errors, compared with 12.3 errors for students with lower scores. Using the software, students with higher verbal scores reading the same passage made, on average, 16 errors, compared with 17 errors for students. with lower scores.Dennis Galletta, a professor of information systems at the Katz Business School, said spell-check software is so sophisticated that some have come to trust it too thoroughly. (35)'It's not a software problem, it's a behavior. problem,' he saiD.Microsoft technical specialist Tim Pash said grammar and spelling technology is meant to help writers and editors, not solve all their problems. (35)The study found the software helped students find and correct errors in the letter, but in some cases they also changed phrases and sentences flagged by the software as grammatically suspicious, even though they were correct.(30)A.They are asked to find out the mistakes of a letter.B.They are asked to provide proof of the deal.C.They are asked to finish reading the letter quickly.D.They are asked to write a business letter.

A.B.3
C.
D.
(30)
A.They
E.
B.They
F.
C.They
G.
D.They

未分类题

Popular ideological assumptions about society change with the decades, as well as with the enlargement of knowledgE.The analysis of the human genetic code published last week demonstrates that humans, genetically speaking, axe only twice as complicated as the fruit fly, and among them- selves share 99.9 percent of their genes.Culture and nurture count in making us what we turn out to be, although that will perhaps come as no great surprise to those outside the close world of academic theory.This part of the rediscovery of the wheel, since before positivism largely took over the social sciences in American universities in the 1950s, it was generally assumed by professors. As well as laymen, that culture had a great deal to do with how material civilization developeD.Transcendentalist philosophers thought schooling and rigorous book learning put unnatural restraints on children:' We are shut up in schools and college recitation rooms for 10 or 15 years and come out at last with a bellyful of words and do not know a thing. 'That argument, however, relied on historical evidence and reasoning, which had come to be considered 'soft' knowledge--unscientific, subjective, itself culture-bound--and, even more recently, as a self-serving tale told by white male parent in order to oppress the rest.To suggest that modern liberal civilization, science and technology emerged in Western Europe because of a particular cultural development linked to the assumptions, values and philosophies of classical Greece and Rome, the Jewish and Christian religions, and the ideas of the European Renaissance and Enlightenment, was thought to put down other civilizations where such development had not taken placE.This notion,' popular early in the 20th century', according to a New York Times report on the matter, is now 'unsettling scholars and policymakers', since it 'challenges the assumptions of market economists and liberal thinkers'. These are nearly ail, to some degree, economic determinists.The matter is of practical concern in making policy. Take the worst case: the problem of contemporary AfricA.Until the 1950s, Africa was generally considered to be a region of pre-modern cultures, developed among a variety of peoples originally practicing simple agriculture, or hunting and gathering. Some cultures were of great artistic complexity; ail had complex codes of value and ceremony; some were quite advanced politically, resembling in many respects European feudalism(灭亡), but all were without written languages or written knowledgE.What was possibly assumed about humans and the fruit fly in the past?A.They were equally complicated in terms of genE.B.Humans were much more genetically complicated than the fruit fly, genetically speaking.C.Humans were twice as complicated as the fruit fly in genE.D.The fruit fly was less stably than humans in the structure of genes.

A.9
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
What
I.They
J.
B.Humans
K.
C.Humans
L.
D.The