未分类题

根据下列材料,请回答下列各题 Divorce lawyers: Pet custody cases increasing LOS ANGELES——They still fight like cats and dogs in divorce court. But more and more they are fighting about cats and dogs. Custody(监护权)cases involving pets are on the rise across the United States of AmericA.In a 2006 survey by the 1,600-member American Academy of Matrimonial(婚姻的)Lawyers (AAML), a quarter of respondents said pet custody cases had increased noticeably since 2001. The academy is due for another survey, but there is no doubt such cases have grown steadily since then, said Ken Altshuler of Portland, Maine, a divorce attorney and AAML president. If there is a child involved in a divorce, many judges will keep the pet with the child, attorneys saiD.'But what do you do when the pet is the child? 'Altshuler askeD.Breakups in same-sex marriages, civil unions and domestic partnerships are among masons pet custody fights are become more common, attorneys saiD.Pet custody cases have grown as much as 15 percent in his office over the last five years, said attorney David isarra of Santa MonicA.He is his own best examplE.He shares custody of 8-year-old Dudley, a longhaired standard black-and-tan achshund, with his ex, who took Dudley away when got remarrieD.Pet consultant Steven May hired Pisarra six years ago to handle his divorcE.Besides a daughter, May and his ex worked out custody of three dogs, two cats and Tequila the parrot. Pisarra and May became good friends and often take their dogs for walks in Santa MonicA.They also teamed up last year to write a book about co-parenting a pet with an ex tiffed What About Wally? Pets are considered property in every state in the country. For years, they have been divvied up like furniture during divorce proceedings. But times are changing. 'Judges are viewing them more akin to (近似)children than dining room sets. They are recognizing that people have an emotional attachment to their animals,' Altshuler saiD.'There is a shifting consciousness,' Pisarra saiD.'Pets are being given greater consideration under the law. ' More people have pets than ever before and they consider them part of the family rather than possessions, said Silvana Raso, a family law attorney with the Englewood Cliffs, N.J., law firm of Schepisi & McLaughlin. 'People are not embarrassed to fight for custody of a pet today. In the past they might have shied away from it because society didnt really accept a pet as anything other than an accessory to your life,' she saiD.When Pisarra and his ex wife split up, they agreed to share Dudley. His wife even wrote an introduction in Pisarras book. 'There is no law that recognizes visitation with an animal,' Raso said, so couples have to work it out ,themselves. Reaching a pet custody agreement without a lot of help from attorneys and judges will save money, Raso saiD.Divorces can cost $1,000 and be resolved quickly or cost millions and take years. Pet decisions are often more agonizing to make than those about mortgages, credit card debt or student loans,Raso saiD.But if they can be resolved, the rest usually goes smoother. After their 2006 breakup, Pisarra and his wife worked out shared custody, long-distance visitation and a new family (including a beaglE.in Dudleys life, Pisarra saiD.Today, they live in the same city, so visitation no longer includes flight timE.The two have a plan for everyday, vacation and holiday schedules, travel arrangements, doggie daycare,boarding, food, treats, grooming, vet care, moving and end-of-life decisions. They split costs and sometimes, with things like toys, leashes(皮绳)and dog bowls, they buy two of each so Dudley has one at each homE.May and his wife Nina (who also wrote an introduction for the book.separated six years ago after 16 years of marriagE.'Everything was fresh and raw. It was not easy. ' Its taken time, but he and his ex live about two miles apart in West Los Angeles now and sharing custody of their daughter and pets is easy, he saiD.To make it work, 'you learn the true meaning of concession,' May saiD.Most of the time, custody battles grow out of lovE.But there are cases rooted in spite(恶意)or retaliation(报复).Pisarra represented a man whose estranged wife had the familys two German shepherds euthanized(使安乐死).'It was really cruel and he had no recourse,' he saiD.In years past, pets could not be protected in domestic violence restraining orders in any statE.But because abusers can use pets to threaten victims, maybe even kill the animals, the laws have changed in states like Maine,New York, California and Illinois. Other states are looking into changes. And there will be changes in other laws too, Altshuler predicteD.He believes there will one day be statutes(法规)for pets, much like there are for children, giving judges guidelines to rule by. In a 2006 survey by AAML, approximately how many respondents said pet custody cases had increased noticeably over the past five years?
A.One fourth of the respondents.
B.Nearly all respondents.
C.400
D.1600

A.J.,
B.in
C.separated
D.Pisarra
E.'It
F.In
G.One
H.
B.Nearly
I.
C.400
D.1600

【参考答案】

A
线索词:a2006surveybyAAML,increasednoticeably定位处:第一段第二句。解析......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)
热门 试题

未分类题
Questions 下列各 are based on the following passagE.In the second half of the twentieth century, many countries of the South(发展中国家)began to send students to the industrialized countries for further education. They urgently needed supplies of highly trained personnel to implement a concept of development based on modernization. But many of these students decided to stay on in the developed countries when they had finished their training. At the same time, many professionals who did return home but no longer felt at ease there also decided to go back to the countries where they had studieD.In the 1960s, some Latin American countries tried to solve this problem by setting up special 'return'programs to encourage their professionals to come back homE.These programs received support from international bodies such as the International Organization for Migration, which in 1974 enabled over 1,600 qualified scientists and technicians to return to Latin AmericA.In the 1980s and 1990s, 'temporary return' programs were set up in order to make the best use of trained personnel occupying strategic positions in the developed countries. This gave rise to the United Nations Development Programs Transfer of Knowledge through Expatriate(移居国外的)Nationals, which encourages technicians and scientists to work in their own countries for short periods. But the brain drain(人才流失)from these countries may well increase in response to the new laws of the international market in knowledgE.Recent studies forecast that the most developed countries are going to need more and more highly qualified professionals around twice as many as their educational systems will be able to produce, or so it is thought. As a result there is an urgent need for developing countries which send students abroad to give preference to fields where they need competent people to give muscle to their own institutions, instead of encouraging the training of people who may not come back because there are no professional outlets for them. And the countries of the South must not be content with institutional structures that simply take back professionals sent abroad, they must introduce flexible administrative procedures to encourage them to return. If they do not do this, the brain drain is bound to continuE.Which of the following is NOT correct according to the passage?A.The developing countries believe that sending students to the industrialized countries is a good way to meet their own needs for modernization.B.The South American countries have been sending students to developed countries since the 1920s.C.Many people trained abroad remain in the developed countries instead of coming back to serve their home countries.D.The International Organization for Migration successfully helped more than 1,600 professionals to return to their own countries in a single year.
A.The
B.
B.The
C.
C.Many
D.
D.The
E.