TEXT B Educators are seriously
concerned about the high rate of dropouts between the doctor of philosophy
candidates and the consequent loss of talent to a nation in need of Ph. D. s.
Some have placed the dropouts loss as high as 50 percent. The extent of the loss
was, however, largely a matter of expert guessing. Last week a well-rounded
study was published. It was published. It was based on 22,000 questionnaires
sent to former graduate students who were enrolled in 24 universities and it
seemed to show many past fears to be groundless. The dropout’s
rate was found to be 31 per cent, and in most cases the dropouts, while not
completing the Ph. D. requirement, went on to productive work. They are not only
doing well financially, but, according to the report, are not far below the
income levels of those who went on to complete their doctorates.
Discussing the study last week, Dr. Tucker said the project was initiated
because of the concern frequently’ expressed by graduate faculties and
administrators that some of the individuals who dropped out of Ph. D. programs
were capable of competing the requirement for the degree. Attrition at the Ph.
D. level is also thought to be a waste of precious faculty time and a drain on
university resources already being used to capacity. Some people expressed the
opinion that the Shortage of highly trained specialists and college teachers
could be reduced by persuading the dropouts to return to graduate schools to
complete the Ph. D. "The results of our research," Dr. Tucker
concluded, "did not support these opinions." 1. Lack of
motivation was the principal reason for dropping out. 2. Most
dropouts went as far in their doctoral program as was consistent with their
levels of ability or their specialties. 3. Most dropouts are now
engaged in work consistent with their education and motivation.
Nearly 75 percent ofthe dropouts said there was no academic reason for
their decision, but those who mentioned academic reason cited failure to pass
the qualifying examination, uncompleted research and failure to pass language
exams. Among the single most important personal reasons identified by dropouts
for non-completion of their Ph. D. program, lack of finances was marked by 19
percent. As an indication of how well the dropouts were doing, a
chart showed 2 % in humanities were receiving $ 20,000 and more annually while
none of the Ph. D. s with that background reached this figure. The Ph. D.’s
shone in the $ 7,500 to $ 15,000 bracket with 78% at that level against 50% for
the dropouts. This may also be an indication of the fact that top salaries in
the academic fields, where Ph. D.’s tend to rise to the highest salaries, are
still lagging behind other fields. As to the possibility of
getting dropouts back on campus, the outlook was glum. The main condition which
would have to prevail for at least 25% of the dropouts who might consider
returning to graduate school would be to guarantee that they would retain their
present level of income and in some cases their present job. Meeting foreign language requirements for the Ph. D. ______.
A.is the most frequent reason for dropping out B.is more difficult for the science candidate than for the humanities candidate C.is an essential part of many Ph. D. programs D.does not vary in difficulty among universities.