TEXT A Mass transportation
revised the social and economic fabric of the American city in three fundamental
ways. It catalyzed physical expansion, it sorted out people and land uses, and
it accelerated the inherent instability of urban life. By opening vast areas of
unoccupied land for residential expansion, the omnibuses, horse railways,
commuter trains, and electric trolleys pulled settled regions outward two to
four times more distant from city centers than they were in the premodern era.
In 1850, for example, the borders of Boston lay scarcely two miles from the old
business district; by the turn of the century the radius extended ten miles. Now
those who could afford it could live far removed from the old city center and
still commute there for work, shopping, and entertainment. The new accessibility
of land around the periphery of almost every major city sparked an explosion of
real estate development and fueled what we now know as urban sprawl. Between
1890 and 1920, for example, some 250,000 new residential lots were recorded
within the borders of Chicago, most of them located in outlying areas. Over the
same period, another 550,000 were plotted outside the city limits but within the
metropolitan area. Anxious to take advantage of the possibilities of commuting,
real estate developers added 800,000 potential building sites to the Chicago
region in just thirty years—lots that could have housed five to six million
people. Of course, many were never occupied; there was always a
huge surplus of subdivided, but vacant, land around Chicago and other cities.
These excesses underscore a feature of residential expansion related to the
growth of mass transportation: urban sprawl was essentially unplanned. It was
carried out by thousands of small investors who paid little heed to coordinated
land use or to future land users. Those who purchased and prepared land for
residential purposes, particularly land near or Outside city borders where
transit lines and middle-class inhabitants were anticipated, did so to create
demand as much as to respond to it. Chicago is a prime example of this process.
Real estate subdivision there proceeded much faster than population
growth. The author mentions Chicago in the second paragraph as an example of a city, ______.
A.which is large B.which is used as a model for land development C.where the development of land exceeded population growth D.with an excellent mass transportation system