单项选择题

  Line      There are recent reports of apparently drastic
            declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions
            of a number of the world’s endangered amphibian
            species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a
    (5)    general trend toward extinction, and many
            environmentalists have claimed that immediate
            environmental action is necessary to remedy
            this "amphibian crisis," which, in their view, is an
            indicator of general and catastrophic environmental
    (10)    degradation due to human activity.
              To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a
            preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored.
            A declining population should not be confused with
            an endangered one. An endangered population is
    (15)    always rare, almost always small, and, by definition,
            under constant threat of extinction even without a
            proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance,
            however unfortunate, should come as no great
            surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may
    (20)    indicate nothing about the direction of trends in
            population size—may lead to its extinction. The
            probability of extinction due to such random factors
            depends on the population size and is independent of
            the prevailing direction of change in that size.
    (25)      For biologists, population declines are potentially
            more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent
            declines, especially in large populations, indicate a
            changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions
            must again be made among declines that are only
    (30)    apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual
            cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take
            a population to some lower but still acceptable
            level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by
            taking the number of individuals below the minimum
    (35)    viable population). Anecdotal reports of population
            decreases cannot distinguish among these
            possibilities, and some amphibian populations have
            shown strong fluctuations in the past.
              It is indisputably true that there is simply not
    (40)    enough long-term scientific data on amphibian
            populations to enable researchers to identify real
            declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly
            common amphibian species declared all but extinct
            after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s
    (45)    have subsequently recovered, and so might
            the apparently declining populations that have
            generated the current appearance of an amphibian
            crisis. Unfortunately, long-term data will not soon
            be forthcoming, and postponing environmental
    (50)    action while we wait for it may doom species and
            whole ecosystems to extinction.   Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in lines 35-38

A.To give an example of a particular kind of study
B.To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence
C.To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph
D.To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph
E.To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph