单项选择题

Climate change might force changes in diets around the world as certain staple foods become harder to produce, according to international agriculture researchers. However, future shortfalls could be offset by switching to crops which can thrive in those altered climates, according to new reports by the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research.
Important crops like maize and wheat produce less grain at temperatures above 30 degrees Celsius."Those kinds of temperatures are being reached on a regular basis and more frequently in many countries now," says Sonja Vermeulen, head of CGIAR climate change research. Vermeulen says growing-season temperatures are not the only factors affected by climate change. Rainfall patterns are shifting, too. Water supplies will be strained in some areas, while others will see more floods.
Climate change is also altering habitats for pests and diseases, she says."And for some crops, particularly crops we really value, such as potatoes, we think those are really likely to increase and change in their patterns in the future." Rice will not be spared, either. Higher temperatures, salt water encroachment, more flooding and more droughts are likely as the climate changes.
Some crops in some regions will be able to adapt, "But for others, we’re really going to have to think about switching out of growing some crops entirely," Vermeulen says. For example, by later this century large parts of Africa will no longer be suitable for growing maize. Sorghum, millet and cassava are becoming better options."And when you start thinking through all that, it means changes in people’s diets," she says."And these are fairly fundamental cultural changes."
Vermeulen and her colleagues have just released two reports outlining the predicted impacts of climate change on food production, and also on food safety. She says warmer temperatures will mean foods will spoil faster."This is something we haven’t thought a lot about, these kinds of infections that can harm humans that really might be on the increase," she says.
But not all the news from climate change is bad. Many farmers will adapt, and new farmland will open up in what used to be colder latitudes. So overall, the global food supply may not suffer.
But, Vermeulen says, what will matter most to people is what happens when local crops begin to fail."Are we going to deal with that by greater global interconnectivity so that people can shift out of agriculture but buy their food from somewhere else," she asks, "or do we deal with it by major changes in how people are growing food, raising animals and eating" Over the next 100 years, she says, the world will need to do a bit of both: expand global trade, and adapt local farms to the realities of climate change.
It can be inferred from the last paragraph that

A.animals will be people’s main foods over the next 100 years.
B.the world will need more people to be involved in agriculture.
C.global trade can be helpful in dealing with problem of food supply.
D.agriculture will decrease its importance on people’s life.
热门 试题

单项选择题
In order to avoid penalties, a teacher should A.give students more time beyond the finishing time. B.apply more electronic devices in the exams hall. C.help students to make clear their answer sources. D.get rid of management failure with a warning process.
A further 60 individual teachers also faced penalties for "malpractice", the regulator said, although this was down on a year earlier. The disclosure comes amid an ongoing investigation into cheating in GCSEs by one of the Government’s flagship academies. Kingsdale Foundation School in south London was alleged to have changed pupils’ work after tests and fabricated coursework in an attempt to drive up grades.According to reports, one former pupil even claimed that teachers entered the exam hall during a test, telling students to change their answers. Ofqual insisted that the sharp rise in school reprimands was down to a clampdown on malpractice by one exam board—Edexcel.A spokeswoman for Pearson, which runs the board, said: "In 2012 we introduced a more rigorous warning process so that we can gain far more accurate data across centres on all incidents, both minor and major." According to figures, 130 penalties were imposed on schools and colleges in England, Wales and Northern Ireland this summer, compared with just 56 a year earlier and 106 in 2010. It was the highest total since records were first collated in 2009.
School-wide penalties can be imposed for a serious management failure across an entire institution or department, rather than the isolated actions of one teacher. Three schools were found to be giving assistance to pupils in the exam hall and examiners reported security breaches on 21 occasions, it emerged. Remaining penalties were imposed for a variety of reasons, including opening papers early, sitting an exam at the wrong time and failing to invigilate candidates properly. Most cases resulted in a written warning, although five had their power to run exams withdrawn. This penalty had previously only been used five times over the last three years.
Some 60 teachers or lecturers were subjected to individual penalties, with two-thirds of cases related to "inappropriate assistance to candidates". Other staff were reprimanded for coaching or prompting students and giving candidates more time beyond the official finishing point. Overall, 23 teachers were suspended from involvement in exams.
The use of mobile phones and other electronic devices in the exam hall was the most common reason—covering almost half of cases—followed by plagiarism, failing to acknowledge sources and copying from other students.