TEXT C The communists’
preoccupation with economic growth and their whole attitude towards economic
progress have been shaped by Marx’s theory of long-run development of human
society. This theory places economic development at the center of the entire
social philosophy and it is impossible to study the Marxists’ political, social
and economic views without referring to it. Without the knowledge of this theory
it is difficult to understand the communists’ dogmatic belief in the superiority
of their system, whatever are the observable facts, and their faith in the final
victory over capitalism. Economic development has to lead, sooner or later, to
socialism and communism and it is necessary to build socialism and, later,
communism to make future economic growth possible. This principle is valid for
all countries without any exception. They all have to proceed along the same
path although they may be placed at different points of it at present. Such is
the logic of history. This theory, which is usually referred to
as "historical materialism", "the materialistic conception of history", or
"Marx’s historical determinism", is believed by Marxists to be useful not only
as the explanation of the past and the present but also as the basis for the
prediction of the future course of history. As the final judgment on any
prophecy has to be made in the light of the subsequent events, it is interesting
to compare the developments since the theory was presented by Marx with the
pattern which could have been expected on the basis of Marx’s prediction. The
purpose of this paper is to outline briefly such a comparison and to discuss the
communist explanation of the disparity, which had appeared between the actual
and the predicted course of events. The paper does not attempt to evaluate the
philosophical aspects of the theory, its materialism, one-sidedness and
methodological oversimplification. Similarly, the value of the theory as a
summary of the past historical events preceding the time when it was presented
by Marx and its merits and weaknesses as one of the numerous "stages of growth"
theories are not discussed. Marx’s theory accepts as its basis
that man’s life is a conscious struggle with the natural environment, the
struggle which takes the form of production as "life involves, before everything
else, eating and drinking, a habitation, clothing, and many other things". The
process of production is the interaction between man and nature and it takes the
form of social labor. Man has to improve his instruments of production in order
to master the natural environment but "the development of these instruments
follows a definite sequence" as "each new improvement and invention can be made
only on the basis of those that have preceded it, and must rest upon gradually
accumulated production experience, the labor skills and knowledge of the
people... ". Production is carried on as a social process, because "in the
process of producing material wealth, people, whether they like it or not, find
themselves in some way linked with another and the labor of each producer
becomes a part of the social labor." These relationships among men are called
the "relations of production". They exist independently of human consciousness
and this gives them their materialistic character. They are determined by the
level of development and the nature of productive forces. (546) That a state of communism is to be preceded by socialism is ______.
A.contrary to Marx’s theory B.a phase of "relations of production" C.the doctrine of historical determinism D.considered by Marx to be just as feasible as the converse