TEXT A The 70,000 grocery workers
on strike in Southern California are the front line in a battle to prevent
middle-class service jobs from turning into poverty-level ones. The supermarkets
say they are forced to lower their labor costs to compete with Wal-Mart, a
nonunion, low- wage employer aggressively moving into the grocery business.
Everyone should be concerned about this fight. It is, at bottom, about the
ability of retail workers to earn wages that keep their families out of
poverty. Grocery stores in Southern California are bracing for
the arrival, in February, of the first of 40 Wal-Mart grocery supercenters.
Wal-Mart’s prices are about 14 percent lower than other groceries’because the
company is aggressive about squeezing costs, including labor costs. Its workers
earn a third less than unionized grocery workers, and pay for much of their
health insurance. Wal-Mart uses hardball tactics to ward off unions. Since 1995,
the government has issued at least 60 complaints alleging illegal anti-union
activities. Southern California’s supermarket chains have
reacted by demanding a two-year freeze on current workers’salaries and lower pay
for newly hired workers, and they want employees to pay more for health
insurance. The union counters that if the supermarkets match Wal-Mart, their
workers will be pushed out of the middle class. Those workers are already only a
step-- or a second family income--from poverty, with wages of roughly $18,000 a
year. Wal-Mart sales clerks make about $14,000 a year, below the $15,960 poverty
line for a family of three. Wal-Mart may also be driving down
costs by using undocumented immigrants. Last month, federal agents raided
Wal-Mart’s in 21 states. Wal-Mart is facing a grand jury investigation, and a
civil racketeering class-action filed by cleaners who say they were underpaid
when working for contractors hired by Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart insists that it was
unaware of its contractors’practices. But aware or not, it may have helped to
deprive legally employable janitors of jobs and adequate pay.
This Wal-Martization of the work force, to which other low-cost, low-pay
stores also contribute, threatens to push many Americans into poverty. The first
step in countering it is to enforce the law. The government must act more
vigorously, and more quickly, when Wal-Mart uses illegal tactics to block union
organizing. And Wal-Mart must be made to pay if it exploits undocumented
workers. Unions understand that the quickest way to win this war
is to organize Wal-Mart workers. And Wal-Mart’s competitors have to strive for
Wal-Mart’s efficiency without making workers bear the brunt. Consumers can also
play a part. Wal-Mart likes to wrap itself in American values. It should be
reminded that one of those is paying workers enough to give their families a
decent life. We can infer from the last paragraph that ______.
A.Wal-Marts practices are a moderately nice reflection of American values B.consumers should bear the brunt of paying more for their own insurance C.consumers might exert some influence on Wal-Mart to pay its workers more D.Wal-Mart’s efficiency is beyond what other supermarket chains can achieve