TEXT D We might marvel at the
progress made in every field of study, but the methods of testing a person’s
knowledge and ability remain as primitive as ever they were. It really is
extraordinary that after all these years, educationists have still failed to
device anything more efficient and reliable than examinations. For all the pious
claim that examinations text what you know, it is common knowledge that they
more often do the exact opposite. They may be a good means of testing memory, or
the knack of working rapidly under extreme pressure, but they can tell you
nothing about a person’s true ability and aptitude. As
anxiety-makers, examinations are second to none. That is because so much
depends oil them. They are the mark of success of failure in our society. Your
whole future may be decided in one fateful day. It doesn’t matter that you
weren’t feeling very well, or that your mother died. Little things like that
don’t count: the exam goes on. No one can give of his best when he is in mortal
terror, or after a sleepless night, yet this is precisely what the examination
system expects him to do. The moment a child begins school, he enters a world of
vicious competition where success and failure are clearly defined and measured.
Can we wonder at the increasing number of "drop outs": young people who are
written off as utter failures before they have even embarked on a career Can we
be surprised at the suicide rate among students A good education should,
among other things, train you to think for yourself. The examination system does
anything but that. What has to be learnt is rigidly laid down by a syllabus, so
the student is encouraged to memorize. Examinations do not motivate a
student to read widely, but to restrict his reading; they do not enable him to
seek more and more knowledge, but induce cramming. They lower the standards of
teaching, for they deprive the teacher of all freedoms. Teachers
themselves arc often judged by examination results and instead of teaching their
subjects, they are reduced to training their students in exam techniques which
they despise. The most successful candidates are not always the best educated;
they are the best trained in the technique of working under duress. The
results on which so much depends are often nothing more than a subjective
assessment by some anonymous examiner. Examiners are only human. They get tired
and hungry; they make mistakes. Yet they have to mark stacks of hastily scrawled
scripts in a limited amount of time. They work under the same sort of pressure
as the candidates. And their word carries weight. After a judge’s decision you
have the right Of appeal, but not after an examiner’s. There must surely
be many simpler and more effective ways of assessing a person’s true abilities.
Is it cynical to suggest that examinations are merely a profitable business for
the institutions that run them This is what it boils down to in the last
analysis. The best comment on the system is this illiterate message recently
scrawled on a wall: I were a teenage drop-out and now I are a teenage
millionaire. According to the author, the most important of a good education is ______.
A.to encourage students to read widely B.to train students to think on their own C.to teach students how to tackle exams D.to master his fate