ABERRANT:

A． It discusses an apparent inconsistency in theoretical discourse and suggests a reason for it.
B． It outlines a sequence of theoretical shifts in psychology.
C． It shows why a formerly held view is inaccurate.
D． It evaluates an explanation of a psychological phenomenon and finally rejects that explanation.
E． It places into context the discursive origins of a theory and elaborates upon it.

A． inform the reader of the potential cause of certain changes in rain forest composition
B． suggest that foragers may have developed agricultural practices, then abandoned them in order to focus on more specialized food-gathering practices
C． explain why certain food gathering practices may be less efficient sources of carbohydrates than others
D． introduce new evidence for the interdependence between agriculturalists and foragers in the rain forest economy
E． suggest that certain rain forest food products are healthier than others, though more difficult to obtain through foraging