Some people complain about the imprecise use of language. If human language won’t suffice for code information in the future (1) due to information density and speed and of course due to misunderstandings ( ambiguity) then the analogue language we have now might make away (2) for a digital language. Nowadays, everything is becoming digital. Why not human language Of course, I don’t mean to changing human (3) language by prescription but by convention. Once human language is digitized or replaced a digital language whether prescribed or (4) agreed on, not only ambiguity ends but also beauty and mysticism and culture of human heritage. This means there will definite be (5) advantages of density, speed and clarity so I am afraid a lot of (6) disadvantages as I already mentioned will ensue. Foremost among that is reduction. Digital data is compressed or zipped. Compression (7) means losing part of the information which is beyond human perception. Furthermore, digitalization means reducing human language to (8) two modes, there is current or no current, a duality of yes and no like vending machines or computers. It is always a win/lose situation. This is an economic principle. Although I spend two hours on reading at home (9) I might lose two hours of conversation with my friends. We have to make decision and set priorities. (10)