填空题

The threat of a global outbreak of bird flu makes it urgent for the international
community to cooperate effectively. Wealthy countries will have to provide
hundreds of millions of dollars for the testing and production of medicines
unnecess ary for treating patients suffering from bird flu. Developing countries, (1) ______
particularly in Southeast Asia, which the bird flu virus has spread since 1997, must (2) ______
work out special programs so that farmers will not hide signs of possible
out-breaks. However, the way such farm birds as chickens and ducks are traditionally (3) ______
raised and marketed in the developed world should be changed; there should (4) ______
be more distance between the birds and their keepers. Countries should deal in (5) ______
the disease with joint effort.
The potential effects of a national breakout of bird flu are enormous. Firstly
, the breakout may kill large numbers of people. Secondly, such an outbreak (6) ______
may cause great political damage. The latest outbreak of bird flu has cost Southeast (7) ______
east Asia more than $10 billion. If a new outbreak of bird flu were to last for a
whole year, $ 800 billion would be lost.
Despite the 124 human cases and 63 deaths from bird flu since December
2003, the virus remains mainly a disease of animals. However, the more animals
that die the disease, the more chances it has of spreading to people. Large (8) ______
numbers of dead pr dying birds mean that more people will be exposing to the virus, (9) ______
which will change into a virus with new characteristics. If the international
community works together efficiently, man can surely prevent from such a virus and (10) ______
possibly save millions of lives.

【参考答案】

which→where
热门 试题

问答题
The first is broadly the way Britain is at the moment: a mosaic of communities--Bangladeshi, Afro- Caribbean, Chinese or Jewish holding fast to a strong social identity, but lumbered also with a whole raft of benefits and disadvantages, most of them defined in economic terms l6. It’s possible that will still be the pattern in 50 years time, but not very likely. … The alternative is a pick-and-mix social landscape. At the moment ethnic minorities are moving in different directions at different rates, with personal and social engagement across ethnic boundaries increasing all the time. One crude indicator is the level of mixed race marriage: one in five Bangladeshi and Pakistani men born in Britain now has a white wife, and one in five babies born in Britain has one Afro-Caribbean and one white parent.This implies a Britain in which people will construct multiple identities defined by all sorts of factors: class, ethnicity, gender, religion, profession, culture and economic position. It won’t be clear-cut. Not all ethnic minorities, or members of an ethnic minority, will be moving in the same direction or identifying the same issues at the heart of their identities. It’s about deciding who you are, but also about how other people define you.That’s what will be at the heart of the next 50 years: enduring communities linked by blood through time versus flexible, constantly shifting identities. Identity won’t be about where you have come from; it will be a set of values you can take anywhere that is compatible with full participation in whichever society you live in.