填空题

If the entire human species were a single individual, that person would long ago have been declared mad. The insanity would not lie in the 1 of the human mind—though it can be a black and raging place indeed. And it certainly wouldn"t lie in the 2 . The madness would lie instead in the fact that both of those qualities, the savage and the splendid, can exist in one creature, one person, 3 .
We"re a species that is capable of almost dumbfounding kindness. We nurse one another, 4 , weep for one another. Ever since science taught us how, we willingly tear the 5 and give them to one another. And at the same time, we 6 . The past 15 years of human history are 7 of those subatomic particles that are created in accelerators and 8 , but in that fleeting instant, we"ve visited untold horrors on ourselves. As the 9 species the planet has produced, we"re also the lowest, cruelest, most blood-drenched species. That"s 10 .
What does, or ought to, separate human beings with other species is our highly developed 11 , a primal understanding of good and bad, of right and wrong, of what it means to suffer not only our own pain, but also the pain of others. That quality is 12 of what it means to be human. Why it"s an essence that so often spoils, no one can say.
Morality may be a hard concept to grasp, but 13 . Psychologists believe even kids can feel the difference between a matter of morality and one of 14 innately. Of course, the fact is that a child will sometimes hit and won"t feel particularly bad about it either—unless he"s caught. The same is true 15 or despots who slaughter. The rules we know, even the ones we intuitively feel, are by no means 16 .
Where do those intuitions come from And 17 about following where they lead us Scientists can"t yet answer those questions, but that hasn"t 18 . Brain scans are providing clues. Animal studies are providing more. 19 are providing still more. None of this research may make us behave better, not right away at least. But all of it can help us understand ourselves— 20 perhaps, but an important one.

【参考答案】

the rules we always follow
热门 试题

问答题
Hackers never were part of the mainstream establishment, but their current reputation as villains of cyberspace is a far cry from the early days when, first and foremost, they were seen as ardent if quirky programmers, capable of near-miraculous, unorthodox feats of machine manipulation. True, their dedication bordered on fanaticism, and their living habits bordered on the unsavory. But the shift in popular perception to hackers as deviants and criminals is important not only because it affects the hackers themselves and the extraordinary culture thathas grown around them (fascinating as a subject in its own right), but because it reflects shifts in the development, governance, and meaning of the new information technology. These shifts should be questioned and resisted. They unfairly cast hackers in a disreputable light and, more important, they deny the rest of us a political opportunity.In the early decades- 1960s and 1970s- although hacker antics and political ideology frequently led to skirmishes with the authorities, hackers were generally tolerated with grudging admiration. Even the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the funding agency widely credited for sponsoring invention of the Internet, not only turned a blind eye to unofficial hacker activities but indirectly sponsored some of them. Eric Raymond, prolific philosopher of the Open Source movement, suggests that for DARPA the extra overhead was a small price to pay for attracting an entire generation of bright young people into the computing field.