TEXT D It is frequently assumed
that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary effect on the lives of the
people who operate the new machines and on the society into which the machines
have been introduced. For example, it has been suggested that the employment of
women in industry took them out of the household, their traditional sphere, and
fundamentally altered their position in society. In the nineteenth century, when
women began to enter factories, Jules Simon, a French politician, warned that by
doing so, women would give up their femininity. Friedrich Engels, however,
predicted that women would be liberated from the "social, legal, and economic
subordination" of the family by technological developments that made possible
the recruitment of "the whole female sex ... into public industry." Observers
thus differed concerning the social desirability of mechanization’s effects, but
they agreed that it would transform women’s lives. Historians,
particularly those investigating the history of women, now seriously question
this assumption of transforming power. They conclude that such dramatic
technological innovations as the spinning jenny, the sewing machine, the
typewriter, and the vacuum cleaner have not resulted in equally dramatic social
changes in women’s economic position or in the prevailing evaluation of women’s
work. The employment of young women in textile mills during the Industrial
Revolution was largely an extension of an older pattern of employment of young,
single women as domestics. It was not the change in office technology, but
rather the separation of secretarial work, previously seen as an apprenticeship
for beginning managers, from administrative work that in the 1880’s created a
new class of "dead-end" jobs, thenceforth considered "women’s work". The
increase in the numbers of married women employed outside the home in the
twentieth century had less to do with the mechanization of housework and an
increase in leisure time for these women than it did with their own economic
necessity and with high marriage rates that shrank the available pool of single
women workers, previously, in many cases, the only women employers would
hire. Women’s work bas changed considerably in the past 200
years, moving from the household to the office or the factory, and later
becoming mostly white-collar instead of blue-collar work. Fundamentally,
however, the conditions under which women work have changed little since before
the Industrial Revolution: the segregation of occupations by gender, lower pay
for women as a group, jobs that require relatively low levels of skill and offer
women little opportunity for advancement all persist, while women’s household
labor remains demanding. Recent historical investigation has led to a major
revision of the notion that technology is always inherently revolutionary in its
effects on society. Mechanization may even have slowed any change in the
traditional position of women both in the labor market and in the home. Which of the following best summarizes the main idea of the passage
A.Mechanization of work has little changed the conditions of women. B.Mechanization revolutionizes a society’s customary roles of its members. C.Mechanization of work creates new jobs that did not exist previously. D.Women’s work has changed considerably in the past 200 years.