填空题

Clearly if we are to participate in the society in which we live we must
communicate with the other people. A great deal of communicating is (51)______
performed on a person-to-person base by the simple means of speech. (52)______
If we travel in buses, buy things in shops, or eat in restaurants, we are
possible to have conversations where we give information or opinions, (53)______
receive news or comment, and very likely have our views challenged
by other members of society.
Face-to face contact is by no mean the only form of communication (54)______
and during the last two hundred years the art of mass communication has
become one of the dominating factors of contemporary society. Two things,
above others, have caused the enormous growth of the communication industry.
Firstly, inventiveness had led to advances in printing, telecommunications,
photography, radio and television. Secondly, speed has revolutionized the
transmission and reception of communications so that local news often takes
a back seat to national news, which themselves is often almost eclipsed by (55)______
international news.
No longer is the possession of information confined to a privileged
majority. In the last century the wealthy man with his own library was indeed (56)______
fortunate, and today there are public libraries. Forty years ago people used to (57)______
flock to cinema, but now far more people sit at home and turn on the TV to (58)______
watch a program that is being channeled into millions of homes.
Communication is no longer mere concerned with the transmission (59)______
of information. The modern communication industry influences the way
people live in society and narrows their horizons by allowing access to (60)______
information, education and entertainment. The printing, broadcasting
and advertising industries are all involved with informing, educating
and entertaining.

【参考答案】

the
热门 试题

单项选择题
In discussing Landes’s work, the author’s tone is [A] enthusiastic. [B] skeptical. [C] reproachful. [D] matter-of-fact.
Although his analysis of Europeans expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own common- sense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" on them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty, individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of Europeans civilization led to European success It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fukuyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government.