TEXT A Mass transportation
revised the social and economic fabric of the American city in three fundamental
ways. It catalyzed physical expansion, it sorted out people and land uses, and
it accelerated the inherent instability of urban life. By opening vast areas of
unoccupied land for residential expansion, the omnibuses, horse
railways, commuter trains, and electric trolleys pulled settled regions
outward two to four times more distant form city centers than they were in the
premodern era. In 1850, for example, the borders of Boston lay scarcely two
miles from the old business district; by the turn of the century the radius
extended ten miles. Now those who could afford it could live far removed from
the old city center and still commute there for work, shopping, and
entertainment. The new accessibility of land around the periphery of almost
every major city sparked an explosion of real estate development and fueled what
we now know as urban sprawl. Between 1890 and 1920, for example, some 250,000
new residential lots were recorded within the borders of Chicago, most of them
located in outlying areas. Over the same period, another. 550,000 were plotted
outside the city limits’but within the metropolitan area. Anxious to take
advantage of the possibilities of commuting, real estate developers added
800,000 potential building sites to the Chicago region in just thirty years lots
that could have housed five to six million people. Of course, many were never
occupied; there was always a huge surplus of subdivided, vacant, land around
Chicago and other cities. These excesses underscore a feature of residential
expansion related to the growth of mass transportation: urban sprawl was
essentially unplanned. It was carried out by thousands of small investors who
paid little heed to coordinated land use or to future land users. Those who
purchased and prepared land for residential purposes, particularly land near or
outside city borders where transit lines and middle-class inhabitants were
anticipated, did so to create demand as much as to respond to it. Chicago is a
prime example of this process. Real estate subdivision there proceeded much
faster than population growth. The author mentions Chicago in the second paragraph as an example of a city ______.
A.that is large B.that is used as a model for land development C.where the development of land exceeded population growth D.with an excellent mass transportation system