TEXT D It is frequently assumed
that the mechanization of work has a revolutionary effect on the lives of the
people who operate the new machines and on the society into which the machines
have been introduced. For example, it has been suggested that the employment of
women in industry took them out of the household, their traditional sphere, and
fundamentally altered their position in society. In the nineteenth century, when
women began to enter factories, Jules Simon, a French politician, warned that by
doing so, women would give up their femininity. Friedrich Engels, however,
predicted that women would be liberated from the "social, legal, and economic
subordination" of the family by technological developments that made possible
the recruitment of "the whole female sex ... into public industry." Observers
thus differed concerning the social desirability of mechanization’ s effects,
but they agreed that it would transform women’s lives.
Historians, particularly those investigating the history of women, now
seriously question this assumption of transforming power. They conclude that
such dramatic technological innovations as the spinning jenny, the sewing
machine, the typewriter, and the vacuum cleaner have not resulted in equally
dramatic social changes in women’s economic position or in the prevailing
evaluation of women’s work. The employment of young women in textile mills
during the Industrial Revolution was largely an extension of an older pattern of
employment of young, single women as domestics. It was not the change in office
technology, but rather the separation of secretarial work, previously
seen as an apprenticeship for beginning managers, from administrative work
that in the 1880’s created a new class of "dead-end" jobs, thenceforth
considered "women’s work". The increase in the numbers of married women employed
outside the home in the twentieth century had less to do with the mechanization
of housework and an increase in leisure time for these women than it did with
their own economic necessity and with high marriage rates that shrank the
available pool of single women workers, previously, in many cases, the only
women employers would hire. Women’s work has changed
considerably in the past 200 years, moving from the household to the office or
the factory, and later becoming mostly white-collar instead of blue collar work.
Fundamentally, however, the conditions under which women work have changed
little since before the Industrial Revolution: the segregation of occupations by
gender, lower pay for women as a group, jobs that require relatively low levels
of skill and offer women little opportunity for advancement all persist, while
women’s household labor remains demanding. Recent historical investigation has
led to a major revision of the notion that technology is always inherently
revolutionary in its effects on society. Mechanization may even have slowed any
change in the traditional position of women both in the labor market and in the
home. The increase in the numbers of married women employed outside the home in the 20th century was NOT due to ______.
A.their economic necessity B.more women employers C.shortage of single women workers D.high marriage rates