填空题

Television Since its invention in (1) , television has played an 1. increasingly important role in our life. It affects people’s life in a good way as well as in a bad way. On the good side. Firstly, television has transformed the Way (2) is transmitted. It can show news in pictures. 2. So in a way, it brings (3) to the public. 3. Secondly, television has transformed (4) . It helps 4. people to be better (5) on political issues and thus 5. enhance democracy. On the bad side. First of all, television increases the (6) between people. People have little chance to 6. (7) with each other due to the distraction of television. 7. Some social problems and people’s mental problems are partly caused by this. Secondly, television is widely thought to be very harmful to young people. Young people tend to believe and (8) 8. whatever they see on TV. As a result of this, the young generation is more (9)than the old generations. 9. Television also makes young people become less (10) 10. They have no interest in reading and their writing ability is very poor.

【参考答案】

imitate

<上一题目录下一题>

热门试题

问答题

The Choice Between Arts and SciencesIn the first part of your writing you should present your thesis statement, and in the second part you should support the thesis statement with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or a summary.Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriacy. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.Write your composition on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.

问答题

Scientific methodology is based on generating hypotheses and testing them to see if they make sense; in laboratories throughout the world, researchers spend at least as much time trying to disprove a theory as they do trying to prove it. Eventually, those ideas that don’t prove false are accepted. But fingerprinting was developed by the police, not by scientists, and it has never been subjected to rigorous analysis—you cannot go to Harvard, Berkeley, or Oxford and talk to the scholar working on fingerprint research. Yet by the early twentieth century, fingerprinting had become so widely accepted in American courts that further research no longer seemed necessary, and none of any significance has been completed.The discussion of fingerprinting is only the most visible element in a much larger debate about how forensic science fits into the legal system. For years, any sophisticated attorney was certain to call upon expert witnesses to assert whatever might help his case. And studies have shown that juries are in fact susceptible to the influence of such experts. Until recently, though, there were no guidelines for qualification; nearly anybody could be called an expert, which meant that, unlike other witnesses, the expert could present his opinion almost as if it were fact.

相关试题