TEXT D
The Cultural
Revival in the Byzantine Empire Between the eighth and eleventh
centuries A. D, the Byzantine Empire staged an almost unparalleled economic and
cultural revival, a recovery that is all the more striking because it followed a
long period of severe internal decline. By the early eighth century, the empire
had lost roughly two - thirds of the territory it had possessed in the year 600,
and its remaining area was being raided by Arabs and Bulgarians, who at times
threatened to take Constantinople and extinguished the empire altogether. The
wealth of the state and its subjects was greatly diminished, and artistic and
literary production had virtually ceased. By the early eleventh century, however
the empire had regained almost half of its lost possessions, its new frontiers
were secure, and its influence extended far beyond its borders. The economy had
recovered, the treasury was full, and art and scholarship had
advanced. To consider the Byzantine military, cultural, and
economic advances as differentiated aspects of a single phenomenon is
reasonable. After all, these three forms of progress have gone together in a
number of states and civilizations. Rome under Augustus and fifth - century
Athens provide the most obvious examples in antiquity. Moreover, an examination
of the apparent sequential connections among military, economic, and cultural
forms of progress might help explain the dynamics of historical
change. The common explanation of these apparent connections in
the case of Byzantine would run like this: when the empire had turned back enemy
raids on its own territory and had begun to raid and conquer enemy territory,
Byzantine resources naturally expanded and more money became available to
patronize art and literature. Therefore, Byzantine resources naturally expanded
and more money became available to patronize art and literature. Therefore,
Byzantine military achievements led to economic advances, which in turn led to
cultural revival. No doubt this hypothetical pattern did apply
at times during the course of the recovery. Yet it is not clear that military
advances invariably came first. Economic advances second, and intellectual
advances third. In the 860’ s the Byzantine Empire began to recover from Arab
incursions so that by 872 the military balance with the Abbasid Caliphate had
been permanently altered in the empire’ s favor. The beginning of the empire’s
economic revival, however, can be placed between 810 and 830. Finally, the
Byzantine revival of learning appears to have begun even earlier. A number of
notable scholars and writers appeared by 788 and, by the last decade of the
eighth century, a cultural revival was in full bloom, a revival that lasted
until the fall of constantinople in 1453. Thus the commonly expected order of
military revival followed by economic and then by cultural recovery was reversed
in Byzantium. In fact, the revival of Byzantine learning may itself have
influenced the subsequent economic and military expansion. Which of the following does the author mention as crucial evidence concerning the manner in which the Byzantine revival began
A.The Byzantine military revival of the 860’ s led to economic and cultural advances. B.The Byzantine cultural revival lasted until 1453. C.The Byzantine economic recovery began in the 900’ s. D.The revival of Byzantine learning began toward the end of the eighty century.