TEXT D Man, so the truism goes,
lives increasingly in a man-made environment. This places a special burden on
human immaturity, for it is plain that adapting to such variable conditions must
depend very heavily on opportunities for learning, or whatever the processes are
that are operative (luring immaturity. It must also mean that during immaturity
man must master knowledge and skills that are either stored in the gene pool or
learned by direct encounter, but which are contained in the culture pool--
knowledge about values and history, skills as varied as an obligatory natural
language or an optional mathematical one, as mute as levers or as articulate as
myth telling. Yet, it would be a mistake to leap to the
conclusion that because human immaturity makes possible high flexibility,
therefore anything is possible for the species. Human traits were selected for
their survival value over a four--to five-million-year period with a great
acceleration of the selection process during the last half of that period. There
were crucial, irreversible changes during that final man-making period:
recession of formidable dentition, 50 percent increase in brain volume, the
obstetrical paradox--bipedalism and strong pelvic girdle, larger brain through a
smaller birth canal immature brain at birth, and creation of what Washburn has
called a "technical-social way of life, involving tool and symbol use.
Note, however, that hominidization consisted principally of adaptations to
conditions in the Pleistocene. These preadaptations, shaped in response to
earlier habitat demands, are part of man’s evolutionary inheritance. This is not
to say that close beneath the skin of man is a naked ape, that civilization is
only a veneer. The technical-social way of life is a deep feature of the species
adaptation. But we would .err if we assumed a priori that man’s inheritance
placed no constraint on his power to adapt. Some of the preadaptations can be
shown to be presently maladaptive. Man’s inordinate fondness for fats and sweets
no longer serves his individual survival well. And the human obsession with
sexuality is plainly not fitted for survival of the species now, however well it
might have served to population the upper Pliocene and the Pleistocene.
Nevertheless, note that the species responds typically to these challenges by
technical innovation rather than by morphological or behavioral change.
Contraception dissociates sexuality from reproduction. We do not, of course,
know what kinds and what range of stresses are produced by successive rounds of
such technical innovation. Dissociating sexuality and reproduction, for example,
surely produces changes in the structure of the family, which in turn redefine
the role of women, which in turn alters the authority pattern affecting the
child, etc. continuing and possible acceleration change seems inherent in such
adaptation. And this, of course, places and enormous pressure on man’s uses of
immaturity, preparing the young for unforeseeable change--the more so if there
are severe restraints imposed by human preadaptations to earlier conditions of
life. The author mentions contraception to demonstrate that______.
A.human beings may adapt to new conditions by technological invention rather than by changing their behavior B.sexual promiscuity is no longer an aid to the survival of the human species C.technological innovation is a more important adaptive mechanism than either heredity or direct encounter D.conditions during the upper Pliocene and Pleistocene eras no longer affect the course of human evolution