问答题

The recession came at the best time that it could because it has given the US a chance to make permanent adjustments to the government’s economic and regulatory policies and has offered businesses and individuals the opportunity to change decades-old habits. It has also allowed the nation to look at its place in the world, especially its best options to compete with China and other emerging countries, in a way that would have been forestalled (阻止,阻碍) if the recession had not happened in 2008 and 2009.
The cause of the recession is often blamed on financial firms that took astonishingly large risks with the goal of multiplying their earnings at unprecedented levels and consumers who were willing to aggressively borrow against inflated home values that were not sustainable. Government policies might have prevented this if regulators could have looked ahead in 2005 and seen the danger in financial firms trading in exotic financial instruments and offering homeowners loans based on rapidly rising home prices that, in some cases, were doubling every three or four years. Prescience, born of powerful deductive skills, could have caused regulators to sound alarm bells, but the collapse of the over-leveraged system was seen by very few experts until it was on top of the economy and in the process of ruining it.

【参考答案】

[参考译文]
经济衰退来的正是时候,因为它为美国提供了一个对美国政府的经济和调节政策作出永久性调整的机会,它带......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)
热门 试题

单项选择题
问答题
今天我们如何看待财富 财富这个话题,恐怕每时每刻都在我们的身边被谈论、被涉及,也时时被扭曲、被 误解。但事实上,它被讨论得还远远不够。 对于我们来说,每个人都在以自己的方式创造并享用财富。尤其在今天,个人生活的 改善、自我价值的体现、社会效益的达成,都是以财富的增长作为衡量标准的。但是在某 某家产多少,某某身家过亿,这样的谈论与比较中,财富被狭义化了,它走入了那道窄门, 门后是锱铢必较的人心浮沉。曾经看到过这样的报道,东南亚金融风波之际,香港精神病 院病人猛增。院方为治疗这批特殊的病人,模拟股票交易,使下跌的股票上升,借此缓解 他们因破产而带来的心灵创伤。如果将积聚财富作为生活的唯一目标,那么一旦失去财富, 就会失去整个精神支柱,这样的人生无疑是可悲的。假设你中了3.6亿元,该怎么花恐怕 并不是每个人都能得出合适的答案。 与对财富的过度追求和依赖相反的另一个极端就是将财富泛道德化,敌视财富、 排斥财富。“为富即不仁”这样的儒家固有的观念在今天仍然有其市场。其实财富本 身无罪,而且还是社会发展的见证与量度。就拿民营经济发达的浙江来说,民营企业 的成长、民营企业家财富的积累,也是浙江一省经济发展映像的重要一维。尤其对浙 江千千万万的企业主和个体户来说,每一分钱上都凝聚着他们的辛劳和汗水,闪耀着 他们的勇气与智慧。这些用勤劳的双手创造的财富可以化为商场的购买力,可以变为 外来打工者的工资。“君子爱财,取之有道”,财富本身具有天然的积极性能够使其 来自于社会、反馈于社会。在陈发树豪捐83亿元的行为反遭一片质疑时,这种积极 性要怎样才能更顺畅地发挥出来,值得我们讨论。 如果以一种更宏观的视野来看财富,那财富如何分配的话题是永远绕不过去的。在 社会财富增长的时候,平民百姓的生活品质是否也随之增长,他们是否能因自己的劳动与创造分享到相对公平的财富份额,是我们一直在探讨而且需要进一步探讨的问题。 今天我们如何看待财富各人也许各有看法。如何创造财富、分配财富、使用财富才是社会需要认真思考的问题。