TEXT A The ivory-billed
woodpecker, if you haven’t heard, is no longer extinct. In late spring, a group
of 17 researchers announced in the online version of Science that they had
spotted at least one member of this majestic species living in the cypress and
tupelo swamps of eastern Arkansas. Once found everywhere in Southern hardwood
forests, the ivory-billed woodpecker tumbled in population after the tam of the
century, the victim of avid collectors and logging. It had last been seen in
1944, reduced to what Tim Gallagher, author of "The Grail Bird: Hot on the Trail
of the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker," calls "a symbol of everything that has gone
wrong with our relationship to the environment." "The Grail
Bird" is the story of this remarkable rediscovery, told by one of the chief
rediscoverers. The editor of Living Bird magazine, Gallagher began the book
several years ago with milder ambitions. The plan was to interview anyone who
had seen the bird—or thought he or she had. Soon, though, he was swept into a
web of tantalizing rumors and half- clues, propelled by the possibility that a
living ivory-bill might yet be found. "If someone.., could prove that this
remarkable species still exists, it would be the most hopeful event imaginable:
we would have one final chance to get it right, to save this bird. and the
bottomland swamp forests it needs to survive." Hope was a thing with a
three-foot wingspan. "The Grail Bird" is less an ecological
study than a portrait of human obsession; if not for the outcome, it could as
easily be a book about the hunt for Bigfoot. Gallagher stakes out swamps teeming
with alligators and cottonmouths. He sifts through shady evidence, from fuzzy
Instamatic photographs to bags of bark shavings—peeled, possibly, by the
ivory-billed woodpecker in its search for beetle grubs. He suffers bloodied feet
and an infected knee. His closest companion, Bobby Ray Harrison, a wildlife
photographer and an arts professor at Oakwood College, dresses in full
camouflage gear and canoes with a camcorder attached to his helmet " Sasquatch
chasers," Gallagher’s wife calls them Yet for ail the shenanigans, his book is
an insightful look at what most biological fieldwork involves: a tot of
Sweating, sitting and waiting for ghosts to—maybe—make themselves
real. As tales go; "The Grail Bird" isn’t the most stylishly
told. Gallagher lets his characters talk at too-great length, and the incidental
details are sometimes overly incidental. ("After pigging out on bad burgers, we
got a room at a cheap motel and quickly fell into a deep, exhausted sleep with
lots of snoring.") But most readers probably won’t mind. As some rivers are to
be enjoyed not for the quality of the water but for the quality of the stones to
be found therein, so it is with some books. Gallagher presents a series of
lively characters: Fielding Lewis, a former Louisiana state boxing commissioner
who in 1971 took two fuzzy Photographs of the woodpecker that were subsequently
—and perhaps mistakenly—discredited; an anonymous "woodpecker-whisperer" who
claims to have a telepathic connection to the birds, even a thousand miles away.
(One group of searchers failed, they were told, because they were noisily
scaring off the bird.) Oddly missing from this recounting is any
extended focus on the ivory-billed woodpecker itself. Granted, the bird has been
invisible for decades, a presence notable largely for its absence. Still, the
book might have given us the animal’s history in more detail—something to convey
the visceral appeal of this "grail." Without that, the quest—though
triumphant—at times feels hollow, and the fulfillment of the author’s obsession
veers perilously close to sounding like an end in itself. From this article, we may draw the conclusion that______
A.The focus on the bird is an important yet missing characteristic, and without it even the successful discovery will seem hollow. B.It is not the bird but the human efforts that attract a lot of readers’ attention. C.The article argues that the book is with great content and great focus. D.Although the book is not stylish, readers still find interesting things in its characterization and extended history of the bird.