多项选择题

根据《民事诉讼法》，以下有关民事诉讼中的反诉说法正确的有（　　）。

A.本诉是反诉的前提，没有本诉就没有反诉
B.本诉撤回的，反诉也终止审理
C.反诉与本诉的诉讼适用不同程序则反诉不能成立
D.原告不出庭按撤诉处理，被告提出反诉的，对于原告适用缺席判决
E.反诉既可以是本诉被告向本诉原告提起，也可以本诉原告向本诉被告提起

<上一题目录下一题>

热门试题

单项选择题

Perfectionism often gets a bad rap in our culture,and it's easy to see why:Holding yourself to unrealistic or impossible standards can set you up for depression,anxiety,sleep disturbances and other health problems.But it.1 0ut that not all forms of perfectionism are bad.All forms of perfectionism include high standards.Yet, adaptive or healthy perfcctionism is 2 achieving things because you want to do well,3 maladaptive or unhealthy perfectionism is often 4 by fear of failure or fear of 5 others, one expert says.A study 6 maladaptive to adaptive perfectionism found that 7 people in both camps were comparably 8 about making mistakes.maladaptive perfectionists scored highest on 9 0f self-criticism,perceived stress and depression,while adaptive perfectionists scored highest on reappraisal（being able to change a situation's meaning to 10 it.s emotional effects）.11 aclaptive perfectionism,the person adapts well when things do not turn out as 12 0r hoped for or adjustments need to be made, notes study lead author Kenneth Rice,professor and co-director of the Center for the Study of Stress,Trauma,and Resilience at Georgia State University.13,someone with maladaptive perfectionism has the same high standards or performance 14. combined with an extremely high level of self-criticism,difficulty adjusting when the situation needs the person to adjust,and probably a fundamental core sense of inadequacy 15 things turn out well, he adds.16,the standards in and of themselves are not bad;it's the stuff people 17 to them that can make them 18, Rice says.Not surprisingly,research has 19 maladaptive perfectionism and contingent self-worth（which is tied to one's appearance or relationships）with an increased risk of 20 disordered eating and anxiety,among other health problems.7选？

A.once
B.while
C.unless
D.if

单项选择题

The information commissioner gave Facebook a rap over the knuckles earlier this month,putting the company on notice of likely fines-the equivalent of a few minutes'revenue-for breaches of privacy.On Wednesday the European commission gave Google a vigorous correction,fining it￠4.3 billion for abusing its market dominance with the AndrOJd operating system which powers the overwhelming majority of the world's mobile phones.Google is appealing.The billions of euros at stake aside,it is easy to see why.Google gives most of Android away,not only to the consumers who use it,but to the companies that build their phones around it.As the company points out,there are more than 24,000 competing Android phones available today,from 1,300 companies.How can that possibly constitute a harmful monopoly?Besides,Google has real competition in the smartphone world from Apple.At the same time,these are exactly the factors that make the commission's decision so interesLing and significant.For Google's business to work,it must become as easy as possible for advertisers to reach users.That is the purpose of all the software that Google gives away,from the Android operating system,through to YouTube,Google search on phones and the Chrome browser.This might look like a cross-subsidy,but on the other hand it is the heart of the company's business.The software that Google gives away is not designed to make a profit on its own.This free version does not include the bits that make a phone useful for anything but making telephone calls,and this was the weak spot in Google's defence.None of the enticements-the mail,the search,the maps and the browser-are included.These can only be used with a proprietary chunk of software that Google controls;and manufacturers who want to use the Play store and 11 crucial Google apps must agree not to build so much as a single phone that does not include them.It is all or nothing.This licensing trick is the way in which Google has undoubtedly limited competition.The commission's decision to punish it probably comes too late to undo the damage it has done.All digital businesses tend towards a monopoly,and this is in part because in some important ways they benefit consumers more the larger they grow.Yet as customers we pay for this in other ways and as citizens even more so,not least because the companies fattened by monopoly profits grow too large to fail and too powerful to challenge.There is a public interest in preventing any company from acquiring almost unlimited power.Regulation defends democracy.The phrase a rap over the knuckles （I.ine l.Para.1）is closest in meaning to

A.anot-very-severepunishment
B.anol-very-correciexplanaiion
C.aheavyfine
D.afalsecharge

根据《民事诉讼法》，以下有关民事诉讼中的反诉说法正确的有（ ）。

根据《民事诉讼法》，以下有关民事诉讼中的反诉说法正确的有（　　）。