TEXT B Cultural norms so
completely surround people, so permeate thought and action, that we never
recognize the assumptions on which their lives and their sanity rest. As one
observer put it, if birds were suddenly endowed with scientific curiosity they
might examine many things, but the sky itself would be overlooked as a suitable
subject; if fish were to become curious about the world, it would never occur to
them to begin by investigating water①. For birds and fish would take
the sky and sea for granted, unaware of their profound influence because they
comprise the medium for every fact. Human beings, in a similarly way, occupy a
symbolic universe governed by codes that are unconsciously acquired and
automatically employed. So much so that they rarely notice that the ways they
interpret and talk about events are distinctively different from the ways people
conduct their affairs in other cultures. As long as people
remain blind to the sources of their meanings, they are imprisoned within them.
These cultural frames of reference are no less confining simply because they
cannot be seen or touched. Whether it is an individual neurosis that keeps an
individual out of contact with his neighbors, or a collective neurosis that
separates neighbors of different cultures, both are forms of blindness that
limit what can be experienced and what can be learned from
others②. It would seem that everywhere people would
desire to break out of the boundaries of their own experiential worlds. Their
ability to react sensitively to a wider spectrum of events and peoples requires
an overcoming of such cultural parochialism. But, in
fact, few attain this broader vision. Some, of course, have little opportunity
for wider cultural experience, though this condition should change as the
movement of people accelerates. Others do not try to widen their experience
because they prefer the old and familiar, seek from their affairs only further
confirmation of the correctness of their own values. Still others recoil from
such experiences because they feel it dangerous to probe too deeply into the
personal or cultural unconscious. Expo sure may reveal how tenuous and arbitrary
many cultural norms are; such exposure might force people to ac quire new bases
for interpreting events. And even for the many who do seek actively to enlarge
the variety of human beings with whom they are capable of communicating there
are still difficulties. Cultural myopia persists not merely
because of inertia and habit, but chiefly because it is so difficult to
overcome. One acquires a personality and a culture in childhood, long before he
is capable of comprehending either of them. To survive, each person masters the
perceptual orientations, cognitive biases, and communicative habits of his own
culture. But once mastered, objective assessment of these same processes is
awkward since the same mechanisms that are being evaluated must be used in
making the evaluations. It can be inferred from the last two paragraphs that ______.
A.everyone would like to widen their cultural scope if they can B.the obstacles to overcoming cultural parochialism lie mainly in people’s habit of thinking C.provided one’s brought up in a culture, he may be with bias in making cultural evaluations D.childhood is an important stage in comprehending culture