TEXT C We have to admire Suzanne
Somers’s persistence. She doesn’t give up--even when virtually the entire
medical community is lined up against her. Three years ago, Somers wrote a
best-selling book called The Sexy Years in which she promoted so-called
bioidentical hormones as a more natural alternative to hormones produced by drug
companies for menopausal women. Somers, now 60, claimed that these individually
prepared doses of estrogen and other hormones, sold via the Internet or by
compounding pharmacies, made her look and feel half her age. As the popularity
of bioidenticals soared, major medical organizations like the American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists grew so alarmed that they mounted publicity
campaigns to convince Somers’s readers that these alternative treatments, which
are usually custom made for each patient, haven’t been proven safe or more
effective than traditional hormone therapy for symptoms like hot
flashes. This month Somers is at it again with her latest book,
Ageless. Subtitled The Naked Truth About Bioidentical Hormones, the cover
features a coquettish shot of the actress unclothed from the collarbone up.
Inside, she calls bioidenticals "the juice of youth" and also promotes the
questionable dosage advice of a former actress and "independent researcher"
named T.S.. Wiley who thinks menopausal women should have as much estrogen in
their bodies as 20-year-olds. Now, even some of the pro-bioidentical doctors
Somers quotes in her books are screaming foul. "Many of the claims throughout
the book are scientifically unproven and dangerous," three of these doctors
assert in a letter sent a few weeks ago to Somers’s publisher, Crown.
Somers adamantly defends bet book and bioidenticals. "From a woman’s
standpoint, this is the first time we’ve gotten some relief in a non-drug way,"
she says in an interview with NEWSWEEK. "Doctors are embarrassed that they don’t
know about this," Somers says. "When doctors don’t have an answer, they like to
pooh-pooh it." The word bioidentical is a marketing term, not a
scientific one, and it means different things to different people. To most
doctors, bioidentical refers to a wide variety of FDA-approved drugs that are
virtually identical to the hormones produced by women’s ovaries. They come in
many forms and doses, some of which have been used for years. Somers uses the
term to refer to made-to-order treatments created by compounding pharmacies with
dosages usually determined by the results of blood tests every two weeks (the
method Somers herself uses), or regular saliva tests, a method most experts say
is an unreliable way to measure a women’s specific hormone needs. Somers claims
that she is so "in touch" with her body’s needs that she can "tweak" her
hormones even without the benefit of these tests. Proponents of
Somers’s program say only hormones prepared specifically for each woman can meet
her unique needs. But since the Women’s Health Initiative, the FDA has approved
many new hormone products, including some in very low doses. While the FDA
process isn’t perfect, it’s certainly better than what consumers get with
compounding products: no black box warning about side effects, no package
insert, no data on relative safety, no check on advertising claims and no
manufacturing oversight. Somers says these custom-made
treatments are natural and not really drugs. That’s just not true. Bioidenticals
may start out as wild yams or soybeans, but by the time this plant matter has
been converted into hormone therapy, it is in fact a drug. All of these
products--whether or not they’re approved by the FDA--are chemicals synthesized
in a lab. Another thing you should know: there are only a few labs in the world
that synthesize these hormones. Everyone--from small compounding pharmacies to
big pharmaceutical companies gets their ingredients from the same
places, Somers argues that bioidenticals are safer than
FDA-approved hormones even though there are no high-quality studies to prove
that assertion. In the absence of any reliable research to the contrary, most
women’s health experts say it’s prudent to assume that all hormone products (FDA
approved or not) carry the same heart disease and cancer risks. According to the author, all the following are the traits of compounding products EXCEPT ______.
A.no scientific data on its safety. B.no account of therapeutic effects. C.no surveillance of the advertisement. D.no supervision on the production.