TEXT A
Slavery Divides the Nation Conflicting interests in
north and south became increasingly apparent. Resenting the large profits
obtained by northern businessmen from marketing the cotton crop, southerners
attributed the backwardness of their section to northern expansion. Northerners,
on the other hand, declared that slavery--the "peculiar institution" the south
felt to be essential to its economy-- was wholly responsible for the region’s
relative backwardness. As far back as 1830s, sectional lines had
been steadily hardening on the slavery question. In the north, abolitionist
feeling grew more and more powerful, encouraged by a free-soil movement
vigorously opposed to the extension of slavery into the regions not yet
organized as states. To southerners of 1850, slavery was a condition for
which they were no more responsible than for their English speech or their
representative institutions. In some coastal areas, slavery by 1850 was well
over 200 years old, an integral part of the basic economy of the region.
In 15 southern and border states, the black population was approximately
half as large as the white, while in the north it was an insignificant
fraction. From the middle 1840s, the slavery issue became more
important than all else in American politics. The south, from the Atlantic to
the Mississippi River and beyond, was a relatively compact political unit
agreeing on all fundamental policies affecting cotton culture, using only
primitive implements, was singularly adapted to the employment of slaves. It
provided work nine months of the year and permitted the use of women and
children as well as men. Why did southerners want to keep slavery
A.They could employ large numbers of slaves in cotton plantations. B.They could only produce cotton. C.The black people could go to the north to make money. D.They could unite the southern states.