In a massive makeover of the U. S. work force,
hundreds of thousands of laid-off Americans arc undergoing federally subsidized
retraining designed to provide them with the skills and education to land new
jobs. For some, it already feels like an exercise in
futility. "I’ve tried and tried (to find work) and it’s
discouraging, "said Jama Eisman.49.of Elkhart. Indiana, a laid-off recreational
vehicle worker and single morn who has been looking for a job — any job since
she graduated from a six-month information technology program in early
August. While looking for work in economically battered
northern Indiana is especially daunting. Eisman’s story underscores the high
stakes riding on the retraining initiative for workers and for the
nation. Many thousands of laid-off workers have found work
during the recession after being trained in new occupations. But thousands of
others are finding it can be difficult to hit a moving target when jobs are
still shifting and vanishing. And the complexities of the
sprawling retraining program go well beyond forecasting the job
market. Fundamental questions are being raised about
retraining, even as it has quietly emerged as a linchpin in the federal
government’s recession-fighting strategy. Chief among them=Do retooled workers
fare better in their searches or land better jobs than those who spend their
time hitting the bricks and knocking on doors Like many other
aspects of the retraining program, the answer is far from clear.
The Labor Department and other supporters say the effort is critical to
help the U.S. pull out of the recession and produce a skilled work force capable
of holding its own against foreign competition. But critics say
the retraining program, created by the 1998 Workforce Investment Act (WIA), is
run by a tangled bureaucracy and actually makes little, if any, difference in
helping laid-off workers reassemble their lives. Labor
Department data show that 258, 000 American workers have been retrained in the
past two years under the WIA’s Dislocated Worker Program the main aid program
under which workers return to school to pursue new careers.
Overall the program provided some type of service, ranging from career
counseling to retraining, to 666, 313 jobless workers in fiscal 2008 — a 66
percent increase over the previous year. Funding for the
Dislocated Worker Program has been on a similarly steep ascent. Nearly $ 3
billion was budgeted for fiscal 2009.including extra funding for retraining
included in President Barack Obama’s federal stimulus package.
Tens of thousands of other jobless Americans receive retraining benefits under
the Trade Adjustment Assistance program, which helps workers who lost jobs due
to global trade, or National Emergency Grants designed to help workers in a
hard-hit region or industry. "Workforce Investment Act training
gets dislocated workers back into the work force more quickly than their peers
who do not take part in such programs, "Jane Oates, assistant secretary of labor
for employment and training, said in a statement provided to msnbc, com. "This
fact does not, however, prevent us from striving to continuously improve
publicly funded work force programs to maximize the return on these investments.
" The department also cites statistics indicating that
retrained workers on average made 104 percent of their pre-training earnings in
fiscal 2007, the most recent year for which figures are available.
But a study commissioned by the Labor Department and released without
fanfare in December reached the opposite conclusion, finding that retraining
does not significantly improve earning power. Co-author Kenneth
R. Troske, chairman of the Economics Department at the University of Kenlucky,
said the discrepancy exists because the government compares the workers’
earnings immediately prior to entering retraining — after they have lost their
jobs or suffered some other employment setback — to their paychecks after
completing their courses and finding work. He and his fellow researchers. on the
other hand, looked at how workers in 12 states who underwent retraining fared
when compared with similar jobless workers who didn’t. Their
findings were disheartening. "Those who enter training experience large earnings
losses relative to those who do not in their first two years after program
entry, ’the study found. In general, the WIA-funded program
administered by her department has seen a huge surge in demand for training and
other services, which also are provided to disadvantaged youth and adult
workers. The program has grown more than sevenfold in three years, skyrocketing
from 39.001 participants in fiscal 2006 to 296, 477 in fiscal 2008. As to the author, the story of Eisman tells us
A. it is a risk to accept retraining.
B. many people can not find a job.
C. the nation spends much on the program.
D. jobs are shifting and vanishing.