The Supreme Court will hear arguments about the use of public money for the private schooling of children with special needs. It’s interesting to note what’s not at issue: namely, that when a public school system is unable to provide an appropriate education, it has to pay the costs of private school. The case to be heard by the court is about whether parents have to enroll a child with special needs in public school before the child can attend private school at public expense. Special-education advocates say students shouldn’t have to waste time before being placed in a setting that best suits their needs, while school boards worry about a ruling that could amount to an unfettered right to private schooling at public expense. What strikes us about the emotionally charged debate is the acceptance by both sides that sometimes it is appropriate to use public money to pay for a child go to a private school. So, why all the argument about the approximately $14 million for a federally-funded (联邦政府资助的) program that lets 1,700 D.C. students attend private schools instead of failing public schools To hear critics of the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program tell it, the use of public money for private schooling is as unprecedented (空前的). In addition to the billions of dollars spent annually on private school tuitions for students with disabilities, private schools get public money for books, technology and teacher training. As long as the money is seen as benefiting the child, it is considered a proper, even desirable, use of public dollars. Don’t get us wrong. We’re not arguing for the unilateral (单方面的) right of parents to enroll their sons and daughters in any school they wish with the taxpayer picking up the bill. Abuse of special-education policies has contributed to increase costs that threaten to take needed money from general public education funds. Safeguards are needed. Public schools should be pressed to do a better job for students with disabilities and students without. But there are schools in Washington where statistics show that failure is almost guaranteed. If a school system can’t educate a child—whether because of acute special needs or its own historical failings—why should that child not have options for "a free appropriate public education" What can we infer from the last paragraph
A. While putting public money in private schools, public schools can also benefit. B. Public schools only consider the need of students without disabilities. C. It is children’s right to choose private schools when public ones aren’t good enough. D. There is evidence to show that public schools in Washington D．C．are terribe.