未分类题

第二节 短文理解1
阅读下面短文，从[A](Right)、[B](Wrong)、[C](Doesn't Say)三个判断中选择一个正确选项。
Once there were two micE.They were friends. One mouse lived in the country; the other mouse lived in the city. After many years the Country mouse saw the City mouse; he said,“Do come and see me at my house in the country.”So the City mouse went. The City mouse said,“This food is not good, and your house is not gooD.Why do you live in a hole in the field? You should come and live in the city. You would live in a nice house made of stonE.You would have nice food to eat. You must come and see me at my house in the city.”
The Country mouse went to the house of the City mousE.It was a very good housE.Nice food was set ready for them to eat. But just as they began to eat they heard a great noisE.The City mouse cried,“Run! Run! The cat is coming!”They ran away quickly and hiD.
After some time they came out. When they came out, the Country mouse said,“I do not like living in the city. I like living in my hole in the fielD.For it is nicer to be poor and happy, than to be rich and afraiD.”
The two mice both lived in the country.
A.Right.
B.Wrong.
C.Doesn't say.

A.”So
B.”
C.
D.”
The
E.
A.Right.
B.Wrong.
C.Doesn't

【参考答案】

B
解析：根据第一段第三句可知一只老鼠住在农村，一只老鼠住在城市，所以答案为B。
<上一题 目录 下一题>
热门 试题

未分类题
Mental health professional may be surprised to discover how much is happening online today in the healthcare fielD.Working closely with dozens of online discussions with hundred of others, I believe I have a pretty good idea of what's going on and what is in store for us professionals and leading online mental health issues of interest.For the most part, behavioral healthcare professionals continue to use the online world like most people do—to exchange information and communicate with one another. This hasn't changed all that much since I got on the Internet in 1991 and isn't likely to change much in upcoming years. What will change are the exact mechanisms and technologies used to access online services.Right now, online communities and discussion forums remain by far the most popular areas for professional to enjoy. Behavior. OnLine, you know so well, is one of the leaders in this area and continues to be a shining example of how to build a solid, high-quality professional community onlinE.In the upcoming months, Behavior. OnLine will be improving its discussion forum interface, adding regular real-time hat events, and implementing another quality-enhancing features which will greatly add to your experience as a member.Mailing lists remain popular with professionals online as well, usually because of their increased privacy and stability. For instance, one of the mailing lists I host, Psychology of the Internet: Research & Theory, continues to enjoy ongoing discussions about research and theory into online behavior. Some of more recent topics include the Larry Froistad case and validity of Internet addition disorder, Hundreds of other professional mailing lists also exist, on topics. If you haven't ever tried subscribing to one of these e-mail based forums, I highly recommend trying one out. Not only are they good for the collegial chat, but they can also help you keep up to speed with new treatments, theories news, and current issues in the fielD.Another way to stay current is to take continuing education courses. While we're used to taking such courses in person, the idea of taking them online is still new and intriguing education courses. While a variety of such continuing education offering are now available, most are nothing more than asking you to great deal of text online, follow a few links, and then answer some general questions about what you've just reaD.Not exactly cutting-edge stuff therE.In fact, home courses and audiotapes have been available for years and allow you to do just.To make the most of online technologies, we took a different task. Behavior. OnLine has teamed up with Mental Health Net, the site I oversee, to offer audioPsych. This innovative educational offering allows you to listen to a speaker present on various behavioral healthcare topics, raging from cognitive therapy for the treatment of personality disorders to psychopharmacology in depression and sleep disorders. At the same time as you're listening to the audio transmitted to your computer through the Internet, slides automatically appear on your computer screen just as if you were in the room with presenter, taking the course live! A number of distinguished faculty are included in audioPsych's course offerings, including C.Keith Conners, Ph.D., Peter Salovey, Ph.D., Theodore Million, Ph.D., D.SC., Michael D.Yapko, Ph.D., James Pretzer, Ph.D., and Barbara Fleming, Ph.D., among others.This kind of technology is not for the faint-of-heart, though. It is recommended you have a 28.8 K or better Internet connection, do not connect to the Internet through a commercial service such as America OnLine or Compuserve (because their Internet connections are too crowed for this kind of application), and have at least a Pentium PC or Power PC MaC.You can try it out for free, though, as every course has an associated 15— 20 minutes' demonstration. So if you're looking forA.Internet accessibility.B.Therapeutic treatment.C.Communities and discussion.D.Behavioral healthcare profession.
A.B.
C.
D.
E.
F.D.,
G.D.,
H.D.,
I.,
J.D.,
K.D.,
L.D.,
M.
N.8
O.Internet
P.
B.Therapeutic
Q.
C.Communities
R.
D.Behavioral
未分类题
Bad InvestmentTake it from a businessman: The War on Drugs is just money down the drain.As a Republican, I'm neither soft on crime nor pro-drugs in any sensE.I believe a person who harms another person should be punisheD.But as a successful businessman, I also believe that locking up more and more people who are nonviolent drug offenders, the people whose real problem is that they are addicted to drugs, is simply a waste of money and human resources.Drugs are a handicap. I don't think anyone should use them. But if a person is using marijuana in his or her own home, doing no harm to anyone other than arguably to himself or herself, should that person be arrested and put in jail? In my opinion, the answer is no.Any social policy or endeavor should be evaluated based on its actual effectiveness, just as in business any investment should be evaluated based on its returns. By that standard, the nationwide drug war is a failurE.After 20-plus years of zero-tolerance policies and increasingly harsh criminal penalties, we have over half a million people behind bars on drug charges nationwide—more than the total prison population in all of Western EuropE.We're spending billions of dollars to keep them locked up. Yet the federal government's own research demonstrates that drugs are cheaper, purer, and more readily available than when this war starteD.Heroin use is up. Ecstasy use is up. Teenagers say that marijuana is easier to get than alcohol. No matter how you slice it, this is no success story.In 1981, the federal government spent about ＄1.5 billion on the drug war. Today, we spend almost ＄20 billion a year at the federal level, with the states spending at least that much again. In 1980, the federal government arrested a few hundred thousand people on drug charges; today we arrest 1.6 million people a year for drug offenses. Yet we still have a drug problem. Should we continue until the federal government spends ＄40 billion and arrests 3.2 million people a year for drugs? What about ＄80 billion and 6.4 million arrests? The logical conclusion of this is that we'll be spending the entire gross national product on drug-law enforcement and still not be addressing our drug problem. I believe the costs outweigh the benefits.In New Mexico, the cost to the state of treating drug use as a crime is over ＄43 million per year and this does not even include local and federal expenditures, which nearly triple that number. Over hair of that money goes to corrections costs. Yet despite this outlay, New Mexico has one of the highest rates of drug-related crime and one of the highest heroin-usage rates in the nation. Our results dictate that our money be spent another way. That's why I have called for a reevaluation of my state's current drug strategies, and we have begun to make great progress in this areA.A study by the RAND Corporation shows that every dollar spent on treatment instead of imprisonment saves ＄7 in state costs. Treatment is significantly more effective at reducing drug use than jail and prison. I believe the most cost-effective way to deal with nonviolent drug users would be to stop prosecuting them, and instead to make an effective spectrum of treatment services available to those who request it.I propose a new bottom line for evaluating our success. Currently, our government measures the success of our drug policies by whether drug use went up or down, or whether seizures went up or down, or how many acres of coca we eradicated in South AmericA.These are absolutely the wrong criteriA.Instead of asking how many people smoked marijuana last year, we should ask if drug-related crime went up or down. Instead of asking how many people did heroin last year, we should ask whether heroin overdoses went up or down. We should ask if public nuisances associated with drug use and dealing went up or down. In short, we should be trying to reduce the hA.people are addicted to drugsB.drugs become easier to getC.much money has been spent with no effectD.more arrests have been done
A.B.
C.
D.
E.5
F.6
G.2
H.4
I.
J.
K.
L.people
M.drugs
N.much
O.more
相关试题