TEXT E Economic conditions have
improved during the past decade in many North American and European CBDs,
primarily because of an unprecedented pace of office construction.
Downtowns that were generally considered dead and beyond help as recently as the
1970s are now filled with both local residents and tourists, even during
evenings and weekends when offices are closed. The new downtown 6ffices, shops,
and recreation facilities provide cities with additional tax revenues that can
be used to maintain essential services. The underclass The
atmosphere of animation and prosperity found in many CBDs does not extend to the
surrounding residential areas. With the exception of a handful of renovated
neighborhoods, the zone in transition is inhabited by large numbers of persons
who are frequently referred to as a permanent underclass. These inner-city
residents are increasingly trapped in an unending cycle of economic and social
problems and are not able to share in the revival of the CBDs.
The underclass suffers from relatively high rates of unemployment,
alcoholism, drug addiction, illiteracy, juvenile delinquency, and crime. For
them, schools have deteriorated, and affordable housing is increasingly
difficult to find. Neighborhoods lack adequate police protection, fire services,
and shops, as well as hospitals, clinics, and other health-care
facilities. Future prospects are especially bleak for the
underclass because they are increasingly unable to compete for jobs. Inner-city
residents lack the technical skills needed to obtain most jobs, because fewer
than half complete high school. The gap between the skills typically
demanded by employers and the training of inner-city residents is getting much
larger. In the past, people with limited education could become factory workers
or filing clerks, but today these jobs require knowledge of computing and
handling electronics. Meanwhile, inner-city residents don’t even have access to
the remaining low-skilled jobs, such as janitors and fast-food servers, which
are increasingly located in the suburbs. Fiscal problems. The
concentration of low-income minority residents in the central cities has
produced financial problems. Despite higher taxes generated by new CBD projects,
central cities face a growing gap between the cost of needed services and the
availability of funds to pay for them. The percentage of people below the
poverty level living in U. S. central cities increased during the 1980s and is
more than twice as high as in the suburbs. Since 1950, overall population has
declined by more than 40 percent in the central cities of Buffalo, Cleveland,
Detroit, and St. Louis, and by more than one-fourth in a number of’ other
cities. The number of tax-paying middle-class families and industries has
invariably declined by higher percentages in these cities. A
city has two choices to close the gap between the cost of services and the
amount of available taxes. One alternative is to raise taxes, a move that could
drive remaining wealthier people and industries from the city. The other
alternative is to reduce services by closing libraries, eliminating some
public-transit routes, collecting trash less frequently, and
delaying replacement of outdated school equipment. Aside from the hardship
imposed on those laid off from work, cutbacks in public services could also
encourage middle-class residents and industries to move from the city.
To avoid this dilemma, cities have increasingly sought funds from the
state and federal governments. The federal government increased its share of
contribution to city budgets from 1 percent in the 1950s to 25 percent in the
early 1980s. Since the early 1980s, though, the federal government has
substantially reduced its contributions to local governments. State governments
and private corporations have increased financial assistance to cities to offset
partially the loss of federal funds. The high level of outside financial support
has obscured the intensity of the fiscal crisis faced by cities as a result of
shifting patterns of land use. As is suggested in the passage, the most likely result of the two alternatives in solving the fiscal problem is ______.
A.a greater concentration of middle-class residents in central cities B.a sharp decline of the life quality in central cities C.a boom in setting up factories and offices in central cities D.a rapid development of public transportation