TEXT F The Greeks have a second
Battle of Marathon on their hands. Their adversaries this time are not invading
Persians, as in 490 B. C. , but environmentalists and archaeologists in growing
numbers. They are closing ranks in opposition to plans to build a water sports
complex at the historic battleground for use during the 2004 Olympics in
Athens. Opposition to the construction has been gaining strength
in Greece and the rest of Europe since the plans were announced more than a year
ago. After standing back from the controversy at first, American archaeologists
are now speaking out against the project as a threat to the site of one of the
most decisive battles in antiquity. In the current issue of
Archaeology, a magazine of the Archaeological Institute of America, Dr. Nancy C.
Wilkie, the organization’s president, called on colleagues "to join in the
effort to preserve this important historic and natural site."
Dr. Wilkie said the battlefield needed to he preserved because even after
all this time, the plain, where the outnumbered Athenian army defeated the
Persians, and the adjacent wetlands, where many Persian soldiers perished, "have
yet to be fully investigated by archaeologists."
Environmentalists challenged the decision to create two artificial lakes
for the rowing and canoe and kayak competitions, a grandstand and other
buildings in the area of the coastal wetlands. They said the construction would
not only intrude on the battle site but would endanger the wetlands, which are a
haven for 176 species of birds and many rare plants and a vital stopover for
migratory birds, including the rare glossy ibis. A number of appeals seeking to
stop the construction are before an administrative court.
Defending the construction, Greek Olympic organizers insisted that
Marathon was hardly a pristine landscape. Summer tourists flock to the Skinias
beach, where the Persians are thought to have landed, and parts of the plain are
already altered with farms and villages. The organizers noted that one of the
lakes would replace an old airstrip. Their plans also include protection for the
wetlands as a national park. "It is impossible to create
something like Waterloo or Gettysburg in this area," George Kazantzopoulos,
environmental program manager for the Olympic organizers, has said. "It is
already ruined." But Dr. Dorothy King emphasized the intangibles of the
issue. "The importance of the site is as much in its symbolism-it would be the
equivalent of putting a theme park in the middle of the site of the Battle of
Gettysburg." Promoters of the construction have argued that the actual
battlefield would not be affected because parts of what is now considered the
site, including the Schinias beach, were three to six feet beneath the sea in
antiquity. But Dr. Wilkie, in her editorial, noted that a
geological study conducted under the auspices of the American School of
Classical Studies in Athens contradicted such claims. By drilling bore holes to
a depth of 26 feet across the plain, geologists determined that the topography
was little changed since the battle. The site for the proposed water sports
center, the research showed, was not beneath the sea 2,500 years ago.
But international pleas and recent protests at Marathon have so far left
the Olympic organizers unmoved. While work on the $ 44 million project
continues, they have defended the construction as possibly the best thing that
could happen to Marathon. It is, they said, a way to rescue the site from
earlier unplanned and often shabby development.
Environmentalists and archaeologists, fearing that the project would
instead attract more commercial development, said they were not ready to give up
the fight and, like the defeated Persians, flee to their ships. Dr. Dorothy is ______.
A.an environmental program manager of Greece B.a Greek official in charge of the construction C.a scholar opposing the construction of the sports complex D.a scholar in support of the construction of the sports complex