问答题

Read carefully the following excerpt on real-name package delivery in China, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should: summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then comment on whether sending package should require real-name registration. You should support yourself with information from the excerpt. Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. Under New Crackdown, Sending Packages Now Requires an ID Card China’s State Post Bureau announced on Monday that it will start a nationwide campaign to crack down on illegal activities by enforcing real-name registration for senders. The nation’s new rules require senders to present official ID, especially when sending from a public place, such as hotels or train stations. The rules also stipulate that packages should go through an X-ray machine for a security check. China began to mull a real-name registration policy in the industry after parcels tainted with toxic chemicals killed a man in East China’s Shandong Province and poisoned seven others in December 2013. A staff member surnamed Chen working in a post office in Hohhot said that senders must take their original ID cards to the post office. "The couriers will scan and record your ID information. Senders don’t need to worry about personal information being in secure. For instance, there will be specially-assigned personnel to keep and manage all this information," Chen added. However, many Net users still expressed concern over the leak of personal information in real-name registration. Zhu Hong, an associate professor told the mass media that whether the real-name registration system would hold back packages containing illegal or hazardous goods is not clear. "We can trace the senders now with phone numbers. Registering ID cards might only speed up the process a bit".

【参考答案】

正确答案： Real-Name Parcel Delivery, Security Guarantee or Priva......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案、解析 ↓↓↓)
<上一题 目录 下一题>
热门 试题

问答题
Read carefully the following excerpt on the trend of youngsters living with parents, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should: summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then comment on whether adults should live with their parents. You should support yourself with information from the excerpt. Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. A Million More Youngsters to Live With Parents A million more young people are likely to find themselves living with their parents over the next decade, according to an insurance company. The main reason is the affordability of housing, the company said. The study forecasts that 3.8 million people aged between 21 and 34 will be living at home by 2025, a third more than at the moment. The number of households containing two or more families is also expected to rise, from 1.5 million to 2.2 million. Charlotte Nisbet and her boyfriend Jay Arkell—both aged 24—were forced to move back in with his parents in east London, as they could not afford to rent by themselves. It would be nice to have our own space, and not to worry about treading on his parents’ toes, she told the BBC. She cannot foresee being able to get a place of their own in the near future. I’m pessimistic. On our current salaries, no way. If we did, we wouldn’t be able to eat out or go on holiday. But not everyone is gloomy about the prospect of sharing their living space with other couples. The advantages include having other people around for company, cheaper living costs, and more people to share the chores, the company said, Multigenerational living is often seen as a necessity rather than a choice, particularly when adults are forced to move back in with family to help save for long-term goals like buying their own house.
问答题
Read carefully the following excerpt on closing public toilets in UK, and then write your response in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should: summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then comment on whether public toilets should be closed in UK. You should support yourself with information from the excerpt.Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. Public Toilets Wiped Out in Parts of UK Some UK High Streets and public spaces no longer have any council-run public toilets, the BBC has learned. At least 1,782 facilities have closed across the UK in the last decade, Freedom of Information requests found. The Local Government Association said councils were trying to keep toilets open but faced squeezed budgets. Public toilets have existed on UK High Streets for more than 150 years, but there is no legal requirement for local authorities to provide toilets, meaning they are often closed down if councils feel they cannot afford the upkeep. Raymond Martin, of the British Toilet Association, said providing toilets was about health, well-being, equality and social inclusion. It’s also about public decency and public dignity—we don’t want people being forced to urinate in the streets, he said. Joan Dean said her husband Brian, who has Parkinson’s disease, was left humiliated when he wet himself after failing to find a toilet on a trip to Levenshulme, in Manchester, where 18 toilets have been closed in the last 10 years. A Local Government Association spokesman said councils were doing everything they could to keep public toilets open, including running community toilet schemes to enable pubs, restaurants and shops to make their toilets available to the public. Cuts meant councils had less to spend on community services and the next few years would continue to be a challenge, he said.
相关试题