TEXT C The earliest controversies
about the relationship between photography and art centered on whether
photograph’s fidelity to appearances and dependence on a machine allowed it to
be a fine art as distinct from merely a practical art. Throughout the nineteenth
century, the defense of photography was identical with the struggle to establish
it as a fine art. Against the charge that photography was a soulless, mechanical
copying of reality, photographers asserted that it was instead a privileged way
of seeing, a revolt against commonplace vision, and no less worthy an art than
painting. Ironically, now that photography is securely
established as a fine art, many photographers find it pretentious or irrelevant
to label it as such. Serious photographers variously claim to be finding,
recording, impartially observing, witnessing events, exploring
themselves—anything but making works of art. They are no longer willing to
debate whether photography is or is not a fine art, except to proclaim that
their own work is not involved with art. It shows the extent to which they
simply take for granted the concept of art imposed by the triumph of Modernism:
the better the art, the more subversive it is of the traditional aims of
art. Photographers’ disclaimers of any interest in making art
tell us more about the harried status of the contemporary notion of art than
about whether photography is or is not art. For example, those photographers who
suppose that, by taking pictures, they are getting away from the pretensions of
art as exemplified by painting remind us of those Abstract Expressionist
painters who imagined they were getting away from the intellectual austerity of
classical Modernist painting by concentrating on the physical act of painting.
Much of photography’s prestige today derives from the convergence of its aims
with those of recent art, particularly with the dismissal of abstract art
implicit in the phenomenon of Pop painting during the i960’s. Appreciating
photographs is a relief to sensibilities tired of the mental exertions demanded
by abstract art. Classical Modernist painting—that is, abstract art as developed
in different ways by Picasso, Kandinsky, and Matisse—presupposes highly
developed skills of looking and a familiarity with other paintings and the
history of art. Photography, like Pop painting, reassures viewers that art is
not hard; photography seems to be more about its subjects than about
art. Photography, however, has developed all the anxieties and
self-consciousness of a classic Modernist art. Many professionals
privately have begun to worry that the promotion of photography as an activity
subversive of the traditional pretensions of art has gone so far that the public
will forget that photography is a distinctive and exalted activity—in short, an
art. Why does the author introduce Abstract Expressionist painter
A.He wants to provide an example of artists who, like serious contemporary photographers, disavowed traditionally accepted aims of modern art. B.He wants to set forth an analogy between the Abstract Expressionist painters and classical Modernist painters. C.He wants to provide a contrast to Pop artist and others. D.He wants to provide an explanation of why serious photography, like other contemporary visual forms, is not and should not pretend to be an art.