单项选择题

Richard, King of England from 1189 to 1199, with all his characteristic virtues and faults cast in a heroic mould, is one of the most fascinating medieval figures. He has been described as the creature and embodiment of the age of chivalry, In those days the lion was much admired in heraldry, and more than one king sought to link himself with its repute. When Richard"s contemporaries called him "Coeur de Lion"(The Lion heart), they paid a lasting compliment to the king of beasts. Little did the English people owe him for his services, and heavily did they pay for his adventures. He was in England only twice for a few short months in his ten years" reign; yet his memory has always English hearts, and seems to present throughout the centuries the pattern of the fighting man. In all deeds of prowess as well as in large schemes of war Richard shone. He was tall and delicately shaped strong in nerve and sinew, and most dexterous in arms. He rejoiced in personal combat, and regarded his opponents without malice as necessary agents in his fame. He loved war, not so much for the sake of glory or political ends, but as other men love science or poetry, for the excitement of the struggle and the glow of victory. By this his whole temperament was toned; and united with the highest qualities of the military commander, love of war called forth all the powers of his mind and body.
Although a man of blood and violence, Richard was too impetuous to be either treacherous on habitually cruel. He was as ready to forgive as he was hasty to offend; he was open-handed and munificent to profusion in war circumspect in design and skilful in execution; in political a child, lacking in subtlety and experience. His political alliances were formed upon his likes and dislikes; his political schemes had neither unity nor clearness of purpose. The advantages gained for him by military geoids were flung away through diplomatic ineptitude. When, on the journey to the East, Messina in Sicily was won by his arms he was easily persuaded to share with his polished, faithless ally, Philip Augustus, fruits of a victory which more wisely used might have foiled the French King"s artful schemes. The rich and tenable acquisition of Cyprus was cast away even more easily than it was won. His life was one magnificent parade, which, when ended, left only an empty plain.
In 1199, when the difficulties of raising revenue for the endless war were at their height, good news was brought to King Richard. It was said there had been dug up near the castle of Chaluz, on the lands of one of his French vassals, a treasure of wonderful quality; a group of golden images of an emperor, his wife, sons and daughters, seated round a table, also of gold, had been unearthed. The King claimed this treasure as lord paramount. The lord of Chaluz resisted the demand, and the King laid siege to his small, weak castle. On the third day, as he rode daringly, near the wall, confident in his hard-tried luck, a bolt from a crossbow struck him in the left shoulder by the neck. The wound, already deep, was aggravated by the necessary cutting out of the arrow-head. Gangrene set in, and Coeur de Lion knew that he must pay a soldier"s debt. He prepared for death with fortitude and calm, and in accordance with the principles he had followed. He arranged his affairs; he divided his personal belongings among his friends or bequeathed them to charity. He declared John to be his heir, and made all present swear fealty to him. He ordered the archer who had shot the fatal bolt, and who was now a prisoner, to be brought before him. He pardoned him, and made him a gift of money. For seven years he had not confessed for fear of being compelled to be reconciled to Philip, but now he received the offices of the Church with sincere and exemplary piety, and died in the forty-second year of his age on April 6,1199, worthy, by the consent of all men, to sit with King Arthur and Roland and other heroes of martial romance at some eternal round table, which we trust the Creator of the Universe in his comprehension will not have forgotten to provide.
The archer was flayed alive. Richard"s behavior as death approached showed ______ .

A.bravery and self-control
B.wisdom and correctness
C.devotion and romance
D.chivalry and charity
热门 试题

填空题
seventeenth 17th[解析] 1-20So, here we are at Newton House, a typical eighteenth-century English country house, set in its own beautiful park. Before we go inside, let s look at the park which really is a classic example of its type, with rolling grassland and scattered trees.Park is a word we use a lot nowadays. But if you trace back the history of the park as an idea, it is actually something which came into being as recently as the seventeenth century. People in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries wouldn t really have understood what a park was, the idea simply didn t exist.But our ideas about the countryside have changed a lot since then, too. People in past centuries knew about agriculture because most of the population was involved in it. But nature, in the sense of wild places, was seen as something dangerous. People wanted civilized, man-made landscapes that showed how the wilderness of nature could be made safe and beautiful. This was how parks began.Well, only rich people had parks, and socially, parkland quickly became significant as a status symbol, first appearing near large country houses like this because it was where the richest people, the big landowners, lived. Also very symbolic socially was tree-planting because trees involve long-term investment. They express a confidence in the future, and so they were carefully planted in prominent positions.What happened during the eighteenth century is that the park became even more important as a setting for a large house, and the fruit and vegetable gardens, which had always been attached to houses, became less significant, often hidden away to one side. This was because if the park was to clearly distinguish its owner as a wealthy person, it needed to be beautiful but not very productive.The immediate surroundings of the house were predominantly grassland, therefore, not fields of crops; they would look too much like work. But that doesn t mean that the land was completely useless. Rich people often involved themselves in breeding animals, for example, which was regarded as a kind of acceptable form of agriculture, something more like a sport.Later, in the nineteenth century, urban parks appeared, taking up some of the ideas of rural park design, and those coming from Romantic traditions, common at the time, of what represented the picturesqueness. These pretty corners in cities gradually came to be used for the recreation of growing urban populations. This was quite a different purpose from that of the country park, which could be seen as representing a kind of barrier around the rich who were increasingly wanting to distance themselves from local farming communities, as well as from the growing urban areas.