单项选择题

ABC公司是一家高科技软件公司，拥有软件工程师80名，项目经理7名，总裁1名，副总裁2名。ABC公司具有严格的招聘筛选制度，其用人理念是必须选用高精尖技术人才和管理人才，软件工程师负责具体软件的开发，项目经理主要负责协调客户、公司、软件开发人员的关系，3名总裁和副总裁主要负责制定公司的发展战略。ABC公司的组织结构是：

A.有机式组织
B.机械式组织
C.沙漏型组织
D.虚拟组织

<上一题目录下一题>

热门试题

未分类题

The study of philosophies should make our own ideas flexiblE.We are all of us apt to take certain general ideas for granted, and call them common sensE.We should learn that other people have held quite different ideas, and that our own have started as very original guesses of philosophers.A scientist is apt to think that all the problems of philosophy will ultimately be solved by sciencE.I think this is true for a great many of the questions on which philosophers still arguE.For example, Plato thought that when we saw something, one ray of light came to it from the sun, and another from our eyes and that seeing was something like feeling with a stick. We now know that the light comes from the sun, and is reflected into our eyes. We don' t know in much detail how the changes in our eyes give rise to sensation. But there is every reason to think that as we learn more about the physiology of the brain, we shall do so, and that the great philosophical problems about knowledge are going to be pretty fully cleared up.But if our descendants know the answers to these questions and others that perplex ns today, there will still be one field of which they do not know, namely the futurE.However exact our science, we cannot know it ns we know the past. Philosophy may be described as argument about things of which we are ignorant. And where science gives us a hope of knowledge it is often reasonable to suspend judgment. That is one reason why Marx and Engels quite rightly wrote to many philosophical problems that interested their contemporaries.But we have got to prepare for the future, and we cannot do so rationally without some philosophy. Some people say we have only got to do the duties revealed in the past and laid down by religion, and god will look after the futurE.Other say that the world is a machine and the course of future events is certain, whatever efforts we may makE.Marxists say that the future depends on ourselves, even though we are part of the historical process. This philosophical view certainly does inspire people to very great achievements. Whether it is true or not, it is powerful guide to action.We need a philosophy, then, to help us to tackle the futurE.Agnosticism easily becomes an excuse for laziness and conservatism. Whether we adopt Marxism or any other philosophy, we cannot understand it with-out knowing something of how it developeD.That is why knowledge of the history of philosophy is important to Marxists, even during the present critical days.What is the main idea of this passage?A.The argument whether philosophy will ultimately be solved by science or not.B.The importance of learning philosophies, especially the history of philosophy.C.The difference between philosophy and sciencE.D.A discussion about how to set a proper attitude towards futurE.

A.B.
C.
D.
E.
What
F.The
G.
B.The
H.
C.The
I.
D.A

未分类题

Two related paradoxes also emerge from the same basic conception of the aesthetic experiencE.The first was given extended consideration by Hegel, who argued roughly as follows: our sensuous attention and that gives to the work of art its peculiar individuality. Because it addresses itself to our sensory appreciation, the work of art is essentially concrete, to be understood by an act of perception rather than by a process of discursive thought.At the same time, our understanding of the work of art is in part intellectual; we seek in it a conceptual content, which it presents to us in the form. of an ideA.One purpose of critical interpretation is to expound this idea in discursive form--to give the equivalent of the content of the work of art in another, nonsensuous idiom. But criticism can never succeed in this task, for, by separating the content from the particular form, it abolishes its individuality. The content presented then ceases to be the exact content of that work of art. In losing its individuality, the content loses its aesthetic reality; it thus ceases to be a mason for attending to the particular work and that first attracted our critical attention. It cannot be this that we saw in the original work and that explained its power over us.For this content, displayed in the discursive idiom of the critical intellect, is no more than a husk, a discarded relic of a meaning that eluded us in the act of seizing it. If the content is to be the true object of aesthetic interest, it must remain wedded to its individuality: it cannot be detached from its 'sensuous embodiment'' without being detached from itselF.Content is, therefore, inseparable from form. and form. in turn inseparable from content. (It is the form. that it is only by virtue of the content that it embodies.)Hegel' s argument is the archetype of many, all aimed at showing that it is both necessary to distinguish form. from content and also impossible to do so. This paradox may be resolved by rejecting either of its premises, but, as with Kant's antinomy, neither premise seems dispensablE.To suppose that content and form. are inseparable is, in effect, to dismiss both ideas as illusory, since no two works of art can then share either a content or a form--the form. being definitive of each work' s individuality.In this case, no one could ever justify his interest in a work of art by reference to its meaning. The intensity of aesthetic interest becomes a puzzling, and ultimately inexplicable, feature of our mental lifE.If, on the other hand, we insist that content and form. are separable, we shall never be able to find, through a study of content, the reason for attending to the particular work of art that intrigues us. Every work of art stands proxy for its paraphrasE.An impassable gap then opens between aesthetic experience and its ground, and the claim that aesthetic experience is intrinsically valuable is thrown in doubt.Hegel argued that ______ .A.it is our sensuous appreciation that gives peculiar individuality to the work of artB.it is the content of the work of art that holds our attentionC.the work of art cannot be understood without a process of logical thinkingD.the form. of the work of art is what our sensuous appreciation concentrates on

A.B.
C.)
D.
E.
Hegel
F.
A.it
G.it
H.the
I.the