Feminist critics’’have often pondered whether a postmodern language may be articulated that obviates the essentialist arrogance of much modernist and some feminist discourse and does not reduce feminism to silences or a purely negative and reactionary stance. This ideal may be actualized in a discourse that recognizes itself as historically situated, ’’ as motivated by values and, thus, political interests, and as a human practice without transcendent justification. The author Dorothy Allison meets these criteria by focusing on women who have been marginalized by totalizing forces and ideas, while simultaneously reminding the reader, through the wide range of women that she portrays and their culpability in her protagonists’’ predicaments, that unlike pure and transcendent heroes, women are real characters and morally complex. Allison insists that humans are burdened with the responsibility of fashioning their own stories, quotidian as they may be, and .while these will never offer the solace of transcendent justification, the constant negotiation between the word and the world avoids reticence on the one hand and the purely negative on the other. The passage suggests that the author would most probably agree with which of the following assessments of optical computing in its present form
A.Although the future of optical computing is impressive, its applications are too limited in scope to justify much optimism. B.The outlook of its development is positive on the surface, but many claims made about it are misleading. C.Efforts to develop the technology have been sufficiently positive to maintain the interest of electrical engineers and physicists. D.Because of design flaws, the task of developing optical computing will require greater resources than are presently available. E.The state of development of optical computing is too contradictory to allow for an easy assessment of its future.