阅读下面的短文，文章中有5处空白，文章后有6组文字。请根据文章的内容选择5组文字，将其分别放回文章原有位置，以恢复文章原貌。 The problem over apyright protection
The US Supreme Court has just stepped into a public debate about the
relationship between property and creativity in the information age. The Court’s
decision to hear an obscure copyright case looks certain to fuel a debate that
could have lasting implications for the publishing and entertainment industries
and for individuals ranging from artists to scientists. (46)
. The case in question tests the constitutionality of what opponents
call the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act", the 1998 copyright extension law that
saved Disney’s cartoon character from imminent death, in copyright terms.
(47) . Beyond the semantics lies a much more
important public debate about the nature of property on the internet. In a world
where the theft of copyrighted property has been rendered effortless by
technology, how can creators be rewarded without stifling the flow of ideas
necessary to feed future creation (48) . The
issue was forced to the justices’ attention by a group of academics campaigning
to defend the "public domain". James Boyle, an intellectual property theorist
and Duke University professor, paints this domain as a kind of creative common
land where we all graze of intellectuals and scientists (and computer geeks) at
Duke, hoping to launch a movement to protect domain. (49)
. The case now before the court is art of the
anti-enclosure campaign. (50) . A. It was the
brainchild of Lawrence Lessig, legal theorist of the internet, who argues that
the essence of the internet is the freedom to innovate. B. How
can society balance private and public rights in ideas C. He
argues that the inexorable advance of intellectual property law in recent years
constitutes a "second enclosure movement" to parallel the 18th century enclosure
of English common lands. D. Its examination of the limits of
intellectual property will elevate to national prominence, a debate previously
limited to academics, intellectuals and the occasional computer geek.
E. The case is to put the copyright law into question. F.
The justices must decide whether the LIS Congress exceeded its authority when it
used that law to extend copyright protection by twenty years.