TEXT E The need for solar
electricity is clear. It is safe, ecologically sound, efficient, continuously
available, and it has no moving parts. The basic problem with the use of solar
photo-voltaic devices is economic, but until recently very little progress has
been made toward the development of low-cost photo-voltaic devices. The larger
part of the research funding has been devoted to study of single-crystal silicon
solar cells, despite the evidence, including that of the leading manufacturers
of crystalline silicon, that the technique holds little promise. The reason for
this pattern is understandable and historical. Crystalline silicon is the active
element in the very successful semiconductor industry, and virtually all of the
solid state devices contain silicon transistors and diodes. Crystalline silicon,
however, is particularly unsuitable to terrestrial solar cells.
Crystalline silicon solar cells work well and are successfully used in the
space program, where cost is not an issue. While single-crystal silicon had been
proven in extraterrestrial use with efficiencies as high as 18 percent, and
other more expensive and scarce materials such as gallium arsenide can have even
higher efficiencies, costs must be reduced by a factor of more than 100 to make
them practical for commercial use. Besides the fact that the starting
crystalline silicon is expensive, 95 percent of it is wasted and does not appear
in the final device. Recently, there have been some imaginative attempts to make
polycrystalline and ribbon silicon, which are lower in cost than high-quality
single-crystals; but to date the efficiencies of these apparently lower-cost
arrays have been unacceptably small. Moreover, these materials are cheaper only
because of the introduction of disordering in crystalline semiconductors, and
disorder degrades the efficiencies of crystalline solar cells.
This dilemma can be avoided by preparing completely disordered or
amorphous materials. Amorphous materials have disordered atomic structure as
compared to crystalline materials; that is, they have only short-range order
rather than the long-range periodicity of crystals. The advantages of amorphous
solar ceils are impressive. Whereas crystals can be grown as wafers about four
inches in diameter, amorphous materials can be grown over large areas in a
single process, whereas crystalline silicon must be made 200 micron of the
proper amorphous materials in necessary. Crystalline silicon solar cells cost in
excess of $ 100 per square foot, but amorphous films can be created at a cost of
about 50 cents per square foot. Although many scientists were
aware of the very low cost of amorphous solar cells, they felt that they could
never be manufactured with the efficiencies necessary to contribute
significantly to the demand for electric power. This was based on a
misconception about the feature which determines efficiency. For example, it is
not the conductivity of the material in the dark which is relevant, but only the
photo-conductivity, that is, the conductivity in the presence of
sunlight. Already, solar cells with efficiencies well above 6
percent have been developed using amorphous materials, and further research will
doubtlessly find even less costly amorphous materials with higher efficiencies.
(499) The tone of the passage can best be described as ______.
A.biased and unprofessional B.tentative and inconclusive C.analytical and optimistic D.concerned and conciliatory