单项选择题

Irish Dolphins may Have a Unique Dialect

Irish scientists monitoring dolphins living in a river estuary in the southwest of the country believe they may have developed a unique dialect to communicate with each other.
The Shannon Dolphin and Wildlife Foundation (SDWF) has been studying a group of up to 120 bottle-nose dolphins in the River Shannon using vocalizations collected on a computer in a cow shed near the River Shannon.
As part of a research project, student Ronan Hickey digitized and analyzed a total of 1,882 whistles from the Irish dolphins and those from the Welsh dolphins on a computer and separated them into six fundamental whistle types and 32 different categories. Of the categories, he found most were used by both sets of dolphins but eight were only heard from the Irish dolphins.
"We are building up a catalogue of the different whistle types they use and trying to associate them with behavior like foraging, resting, socializing and the communications of groups with calves," project leader Simon Berrow said. "Essentially we are building up what is like a dictionary of words they use or sounds they make."
Berrow, a marine biologist, said the dolphins’ clicks are used to find their way around and locate prey. The whistles are communications. "They do a whole range of other sounds like barks, groans and a kind of gunshot," he said. "The gunshot is an intense pulse of sound. Sperm whales use it to stun their prey."
"When I first heard it I was surprised as I thought sperm whales were the only species who used it. We can speculate the dolphins are using it for the same reason as the sperm whales," Berrow said.
References in local legend indicate there have been dolphins in the Shannon estuary for generations and they may even have been resident there as far back as the 6th century.
They are regularly seen by passengers on the Shannon ferry and an estimated 25,000 tourists every year take special sightseeing tours on local boats to visit them.
Irish dolphins attract tourists and over 25,000 people come to see them every year.

A. Right
B. Wrong
C. Not mentioned
热门 试题

单项选择题
A.presented B.selected C.contrasted D.associated
All subjects were free of cancer at enrollment between 1992 and 1998, but (53) an average follow-up of almost 5 years 1,329 bowel cancers had been reported.
The subsequent analysis, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, confirms the long-held suspicion (54) high intakes (纳入量) of red meat are associated with increased bowel (55) risk.After taking into consideration factors like age, sex, height, weight, energy intake, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption, the investigators found that bowel cancer was (56) with intake of red and processed meat but not chicken.
Risk of bowel cancer dropped with increasing intake of fish. Eating more than 80 grams a day of fish was associated (57) a 31 percent reduction in risk compared with eating less than 10 grams a (58) .
Subjects with high red meat and low fish intake were at 63 percent higher risk of bowel cancer compared with subjects with low red meat and high fish (59) . In addition, the risk of developing the disease was increased for (60) people who ate a low fibre diet.
Sheila Bingham, study investigator at the UK’s Medical Research Council nutrition unit, said: "People have suspected for some time that high levels of red and processed meat (61) risk of bowel cancer, but this is one of the largest studies worldwide and the first from Europe of this type to show a (62) relationship."
She added in a statement: "The overall picture is very consistent for red and processed meat and fibre across all the (63) populations studied."
Study coordinator, Elio Riboli, of the World Health Organisation International Agency for Research into Cancer, said: "Other risk factors for (64) cancer include obesity (肥胖) and lack of physical activity. Smoking and excess alcohol may also play a (65) . These factors were all taken into account in the analysis.\
单项选择题
A.illness B.cancer C.problem D.death
All subjects were free of cancer at enrollment between 1992 and 1998, but (53) an average follow-up of almost 5 years 1,329 bowel cancers had been reported.
The subsequent analysis, published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, confirms the long-held suspicion (54) high intakes (纳入量) of red meat are associated with increased bowel (55) risk.After taking into consideration factors like age, sex, height, weight, energy intake, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption, the investigators found that bowel cancer was (56) with intake of red and processed meat but not chicken.
Risk of bowel cancer dropped with increasing intake of fish. Eating more than 80 grams a day of fish was associated (57) a 31 percent reduction in risk compared with eating less than 10 grams a (58) .
Subjects with high red meat and low fish intake were at 63 percent higher risk of bowel cancer compared with subjects with low red meat and high fish (59) . In addition, the risk of developing the disease was increased for (60) people who ate a low fibre diet.
Sheila Bingham, study investigator at the UK’s Medical Research Council nutrition unit, said: "People have suspected for some time that high levels of red and processed meat (61) risk of bowel cancer, but this is one of the largest studies worldwide and the first from Europe of this type to show a (62) relationship."
She added in a statement: "The overall picture is very consistent for red and processed meat and fibre across all the (63) populations studied."
Study coordinator, Elio Riboli, of the World Health Organisation International Agency for Research into Cancer, said: "Other risk factors for (64) cancer include obesity (肥胖) and lack of physical activity. Smoking and excess alcohol may also play a (65) . These factors were all taken into account in the analysis.\