单项选择题

案例分析题

The bull was a sacred creature in the religion and folklore of the ancient world.It is not surprising,therefore,that the financial markets of western Europe should be moved by those ancient legends about the creative power of the bull.The stock market speculators translated that power into money and made it part of the speech of financial investors.The bull’s back was strong enough to carry the gambler’s greed for money.There were some who bought stock because they expected it would rise in price and give them a good profit.This kind of speculator was soon called a ’bull’.
On the other side of the coin was the ’bear’.Instead of buying a stock,then selling it,the bear did the opposite.He sold a stock first,then bought it back at what he hoped would be a lower price.There is hard evidence that ’bull’was stock market slang in Europe in the middle 1700’s.Such evidence can be found in the works of several 18th century British dramatists.The famous Colley Cibber,for example,describes a man who boasts of the money he has been making on the Lon don Exchange.’Every shilling,’he says,’out of stocks,bulls,bears and bubbles!’
Samuel Foote calls one of his characters a ’mere bull and bear booby:the patron of lame ducks,brokers and fraudulent (欺骗性的)foot bankrupts!’Still,it is generally believed that ’bear’became part of stock market slang long before ’bull’did so.The use of ’bear’,we are told,comes from a very old and well-known fable.This is the story of a man who sold the skin of a bear even before he caught the animal,just as some speculators sold stocks that they had not yet bought.English financiers of the 17th century made fun of such traders and called them ’break skin jobbers’.As an English dictionary of the time explained:’To sell a bear is to sell what one has not.’
The financial history of the past 200years,both in America and Europe,tells some wild stories about the bears and bulls and their efforts to influence the stock market.Some of their dishonest deals,trades and speculations have given writers and dramatists much material for their plays,novels and satires.
Happily,in recent times,the bears and the bulls have been brought under control.Laws have been passed to keep dishonest traders from the exchanges.The bears and the bulls in their time have had their fun and their profits.They certainly were a wild breed in their more dramatic and destructive days,bringing ruin to the exchanges and economies of nations.
They make colorful,exciting reading,but they are part of the past.Today,thank God,the bears and bulls have been tamed.They now act like house pets--as seen in the words of a modem American poet,’I play with the bulls and the bears.’

Which of the following is the most suitable title for this passage?()

A.Bears and Bulls
B.The Domestication of Bears
C.Phrases and Animals
D.Bullfighting

热门 试题

未分类题
Do We Need Cities Any More? I don't want to live in a city. Perhaps we divide naturally into two types: those for whom cities are vibrant(振动的)and exciting, a focus for human activity; and those for whom they are dirty, noisy and dangerous. It may be unfashionable, but I'm in the latter camp. I do not believe that we are a species whose behavior. improves in overcrowded conditions. A new study proposes a significant increase in the capacity of towns and cities through a combination of increased housing densities, lower on-plot provision for cars and more on-street parking, and the re-use of marginal open space that is empty of any amenity value(休闲价值). The benefit of this approach is to reduce the loss of green fields and to help 'move towards more sustainable patterns of development'. This study suggests that it would be possible to achieve a 25% increase in density in a typical provincial city without changing the traditional street scene, although it would be necessary to reduce the size of the houses and substitute parking spaces for garages. Therefore, the cost of this approach is to have more people living in smaller homes at higher densities, along, streets that are lined with parked cars. Can we really accept the notion that space within dwellings may be reduced even further? In times when, we are told, living standards are rising in real terms, is it realistic to seek to reduce personal space standards? The streets of many inner suburbs are already lined with cars on both sides, reducing movement to a single lane. Increasing densities means accepting urban streets that are designed as linear car parks, bounded by even smaller living units and modified only by occasional trees growing from the tarmac(柏油碎石路). Would the benefits of higher density be worth the disadvantages of increasing on-street parking? Can we achieve a satisfactory visual environment from such raw materials? Higher urban densities may be communally good for us, but they will fail to meet the desire of many prospective home owners. Those without economic choice can be directed to live in this way, but if we are to continue to rely on the private sector to produce this urban housing, it will need to appeal to the private developers' customers. Who will choose to live in these high-density developments of small dwellings, with minimal open space and a chance to park on the highway if you are lucky enough to find a space? The main consumers will be single people, couples without children, and perhaps some 'empty nesters'(people whose children have grown up and left home). These are people who can choose to spend much of their time outside their home, making the most of those urban cultural opportunities or getting away at weekends to a country cottage or sporting activities. The combination of a young family and a mortgage(抵押贷款)restricts the mobility and spending power of many couples. Most people with a family will try to avoid bringing up their children in an overcrowded flat or house. Space for independent activity is important in developing the individual and in maintaining family balance. The garden is the secure place where the children can work off excess energy. There is a danger that planners may take a dispassionate(冷清的), logical view of how we should live, and seek to force society into that shape. A few years ago a European Commission study provided a good example of this. It took the view, quite sensibly, that housing should not be under-occupied because this is a waste of resources. Therefore, it would be much better if the many thousands of old ladies who live alone in large detached houses would move into small urban flats, thus releasing the large houses for families. What the study failed to recognize was that many of those old ladies prefer to continue to live in their family home with their familiar surroundings and, most importaA.YB.NC.NG