未分类题

阅读下面材料，按要求作文。
煤、石墨、钻石的化学成分相同，都是碳。碳经过高温、高压，分子结构发生改变，就成了璀璨夺目、坚硬无比的钻石。因此，即使是石墨，只要愿意忍受高温、高压，也可以有一个华丽的转身——变成钻石。在价格上，钻石远远高过了煤和石墨，因为它的珍稀，因为它在切割高硬度物品时无可替代的作用。但不能因此就否认煤和石墨的价值。在寒冷的绝境，你是要可以取暖的煤，还是要闪闪发光的钻石?在需要连通电路时，你是选择导电的石墨，还是选择价值连城的钻石?
这则材料对你有何启迪?请选择感受最深的一点写一篇文章。
要求：(1)写出真情实感．不套作抄袭；
(2)自拟题目，自选文体，字数在600字以上；
(3)文中不要出现所在学校的名称和人物的真实姓名。

A.不套作抄袭；
(2)自拟题目，自选文体，字数在600字以上；
(3)文中不要出现所在学校的名称和人物的真实姓名。

【参考答案】


一类(44—50分)：内容充实，中心突出，结构严谨，语言畅达。
二类(37—43分) 内容较充实，中心......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)
<上一题 目录 下一题>
热门 试题

问答题
材料1有个人不小心打碎一个花瓶，但他没有陷入沮丧，而是细心地收集起满地的碎片。他把这些碎片按大小分类称出重量，结果发现：10~100克的最少，1~10克的稍多，0.1~1克和0.1克以下的最多；同时他还发现这些碎片的重量之间存在着倍数关系，即较大块的重量是次大块的重量的16倍……因此他发现了“碎花瓶理论”。这个理论可以帮助人们恢复文物、陨石等不知其原貌的物体，给考古和天体的研究带来了意想不到的效果。这个人就是丹麦的物理学家雅各布·博尔。摘编自《光明日报》（2011年2月21日）材料2迪迪·艾伦年轻时到一家电影公司打工，跟着知名电影剪辑师罗伯特·怀斯学习。她在给电影《江湖浪子》剪辑时，犯了一个非常不应该的错误：在从一个镜头切换到另一个镜头时，第一个镜头中的声音竟然延续到第二个镜头中去，并且长达三秒钟，导致的结局：主人公驾驶汽车逐渐远去，镜头随之切换到达的目的地场景，而这时依旧可以听见第一个镜头中的汽车声！罗伯特·怀斯非常生气，他把这段影片往艾伦面前一扔说：“把你所犯的错误剪掉！”艾伦沮丧极了，正在她准备剪去自己所犯的那个“错误”时，她忽然看见窗台上的一个小盆景，那是一株地莓，她曾经生长在艾伦家的园子里。只是别的地莓都能长出又甜又红的果实，唯独这株地莓不会结果，可它虽然不会结果，却能开出特别鲜红的花朵！所以艾伦把它移植到了这里，成了一道美丽的风景！如果说不会结果是一种“错误”，但就在这种错误中，它却开出了最美丽的花！想到这里，艾伦怦然心动，她开始重新审视起那段影片，猛然意识到：这个错误的本身，其实就是一朵最美丽的地莓花！按照传统的技法，在镜头切换的同时声音也随之戛然而止，艾伦却把声音延续到第二个镜头中，而这不仅能巧妙糅合由镜头切换而产生的断裂感，还能更加有序地连贯电影节奏！艾伦由此想到，有些时候，把第二个镜头中的声音提前一点出现在第一个镜头的结尾处，也是一种能巧妙显示电影节奏的手法。于是，她把这种“错位剪辑”用到了这部影片的每一个切换的镜头中。影片上映后，这种剪辑效果让所有观众耳目一新，并引起了电影同行的关注和沿用，一场电影剪辑艺术的革新悄悄开始了！当86岁高龄的艾伦病逝后，人们对艾伦的人生态度和对电影的贡献作了这样的总结：“她深信这个世界上没有真正的错误，只有被忽略的智慧！即便是一株无法结出果实的地莓，也不要轻易扔掉，因为它可能会开出最美丽的花朵！”摘编自《扬子晚报》（2011年6月27日）（1）从打碎花瓶这一现象中所概括出的“碎花瓶理论”为什么能帮助人们恢复文物、陨石等不知原貌的物体？（2）如何理解“这个世界上没有真正的错误，只有被忽略的智慧”？（3）上述两例对我们增强创新意识有何启示？
未分类题
根据下列材料，请回答 36～40 题： If the trade unionist Jimmy Hoffa were alive today, he would probably represent civil servant. When Hoffa’s Teamsters were in their prime in 1960, only one in ten American government workers belonged to a union; now 36% do. In 2009 the number of unionists in America’s public sector passed that of their fellow members in the private sector. In Britain, more than half of public-sector workers but only about 15% of private-sector ones are unionized. There are three reasons for the public-sector unions’ thriving. First, they can shut things down without suffering much in the way of consequences. Second, they are mostly bright and well-educated. A quarter of America’s public-sector workers have a university degree. Third, they now dominate left-of-centre politics. Some of their ties go back a long way. Britain’s Labor Party, as its name implies, has long been associated with trade unionism. Its current leader, Ed Miliband, owes his position to votes from public-sector unions. At the state level their influence can be even more fearsome. Mark Baldassare of the Public Policy Institute of California points out that much of the state’s budget is patrolled by unions. The teachers’ unions keep an eye on schools, the CCPOA on prisons and a variety of labor groups on health care. In many rich countries average wages in the state sector are higher than in the private one. But the real gains come in benefits and work practices. Politicians have repeatedly “backloaded” public-sector pay deals, keeping the pay increases modest but adding to holidays and especially pensions that are already generous. Reform. has been vigorously opposed, perhaps most egregiously in education, where charter schools, academies and merit pay all faced drawn-out battles. Even though there is plenty of evidence that the quality of the teachers is the most important variable, teachers’ unions have fought against getting rid of bad ones and promoting good ones. As the cost to everyone else has become clearer, politicians have begun to clamp down. In Wisconsin the unions have rallied thousands of supporters against Scott Walker, the hardline Republican governor. But many within the public sector suffer under the current system, too. John Donahue at Harvard’s Kennedy School points out that the norms of culture in Western civil services suit those who want to stay put but is bad for high achievers. The only American public-sector workers who earn well above $250,000 a year are university sports coaches and the president of the United States. Bankers’ fat pay packets have attracted much criticism, but a public-sector system that does not reward high achievers may be a much bigger problem for America. 第 36 题 It can be learned from the first paragraph that[A] Teamsters still have a large body of members.[B] Jimmy Hoffa used to work as a civil servant. [C] unions have enlarged their public-sector membership. [D]the government has improved its relationship with unionists.
相关试题