单项选择题

甲股份有限公司(以下简称甲公司)为了建造一栋厂房,于2001年11月1 专门从某银行借入 5000万元(假定甲公司向该银行的借款仅此一笔),借款期限为2年,年利率为6%,利息到期一次支付。该厂房采用出包方式建造,与承包方签订的工程合同的总造价为8000万元。假定利息资本化金额按年计算,每年按360天计算.每月按30天计算。
(1) 2002年发生的与厂房建造有关的事项如下:1月
1日.厂房正式动工兴建、当日用银行存款向承包方支付工程进度款1200万元。
3月1日,用银行存款向承包方付工程进度款3000万元。
4月1日。因与承包方发生质量纠纷,工程被迫停工。
8月1日.工程重新开工。
10月1日,用银行存款向承包方支付工程进度款800万元。
12月31日,工程全部完工,可投入使用。甲公司需要支付工程价款9000万元。
(2) 2003年发生的与所建厂房和债务重细.有关的事项如下:
1月31日,办理厂房工程竣工决算,与承包方结算的工程总造价为8000万元,;同日工程交付手续办理完毕,剩余工程款尚未支付。
11月1日。甲公司发生财务困难,无法按期偿还于
2001年11月1日借入的到期借款本金和利息。按照借款合同,公司在借款逾期未还期间,仍然必须照原利率支付利息,如果逾期期间超过两个月,银行还将加收1%的罚息。
11月10日,银行将其对甲公司的债权全部划给资产管理公司。
12月1日,甲公司与资产管理公司达成债务重组协议,债务重组日为12月1日,与债务重组有关的资产、债权和债务的所有权划转及相关法律手续均于当日办理完毕。有关债务重组及相关资料如下:
①资产管理公司首先豁免甲公司所有积欠利息。
②甲公司用一辆小轿车和一栋别墅抵偿债务640万元。该小轿车的原价为150万元,累计折旧为30万元,公允价值为90万元。该别墅原价为600万元,累计折旧为100万元,公允价值为550万元。两项资产均未计提减值准备。
③资产管理公司对甲公司的剩余债权实施债权转股,资产管理公司由此获得甲公司普通股1000万股,每股市价4元。
(3) 2004年发生的与资产置换有关的事项如下: 12月1日,甲公司由于产业转型和产品结构调整,与资产管理公司控股的乙公司(该公司为房地产开发公司)达成资产置换协议。协议规定将前述新建厂房与乙公司所开发的一幢办公楼进行置换,有关资料如下:
①甲公司所换出的新建厂房的公允价值为6000万元,甲公司对新建厂房采用直线法计提折旧,预计使用年限为10年,预计净残值为210万元。
②乙公司用于置换的办公楼的账面价值为6600万元,公允价值为6200万元。
③甲方向乙方支付补价款200万元。
假定不考虑与厂房建造、债务重组和资产置换有关的税费。
借款费用停止资本化的时点为( )。
A.37347
B.37621
C.37257
D.37469

A.每月按30天计算。
B.厂房正式动工兴建、当日用银行存款向承包方支付工程进度款1200万元。
3月1日,用银行存款向承包方付工程进度款3000万元。
4月1日。因与承包方发生质量纠纷,工程被迫停工。
8月1日.工程重新开工。
10月1日,用银行存款向承包方支付工程进度款800万元。
12月31日,工程全部完工,可投入使用。甲公司需要支付工程价款9000万元。
C.有关的事项如下:
1月31日,办理厂房工程竣工决算,与承包方结算的工程总造价为8000万元,;同日工程交付手续办理完毕,剩余工程款尚未支付。
11月1日。甲公司发生财务困难,无法按期偿还于
2001年11月1日借入的到期借款本金和利息。按照借款合同,公司在借款逾期未还期间,仍然必须照原利率支付利息,如果逾期期间超过两个月,银行还将加收1%的罚息。
11月10日,银行将其对甲公司的债权全部划给资产管理公司。
12月1日,甲公司与资产管理公司达成债务重组协议,债务重组日为12月1日,与债务重组有关的资产、债权和债务的所有权划转及相关法律手续均于当日办理完毕。有关债务重组及相关资料如下:
①资产管理公司首先豁免甲公司所有积欠利息。
②甲公司用一辆小轿车和一栋别墅抵偿债务640万元。该小轿车的原价为150万元,累计折旧为30万元,公允价值为90万元。该别墅原价为600万元,累计折旧为100万元,公允价值为550万元。两项资产均未计提减值准备。
③资产管理公司对甲公司的剩余债权实施债权转股,资产管理公司由此获得甲公司普通股1000万股,每股市价4元。
D.37347
B.37621
C.37257
D.37469
热门 试题

单项选择题
Any normal species would be delighted at the prospect of cloning. No more nasty surprises like sickle cell or Down syndrome—just batch after batch of high-grade and, genetically speaking, immortal offspring! But representatives of the human species are responding as if someone had proposed adding Satanism to the grade-school Curriculum. Suddenly, perfectly secular folks are throwing around words like sanctity and retrieving medieval-era arguments against the pride of science. No one has proposed burning him at the stake, but the poor fellow who induced a human embryo to double itself has virtually recanted proclaiming his reverence for human life in a voice, this magazine reported', choking with emotion'. There is an element of hypocrisy to much of the anti-cloning furor, or if not hypocrisy, superstition. The fact is we are already well down the path leading to genetic manipulation of the creepiest sort. Life-forms can be patented, which means they can be bought and sold and potentially traded on the commodities markets. Human embryos are life-forms, and there is nothing to stop anyone from marketing them now, on the same shelf with the Cabbage Patch dolls. In fact, any culture that encourages in vitro fertilization has no right to complain about a market in embryos. The assumption behind the in vitro industry is that some people's genetic material is worth more than others' and deserves to be reproduced at any expense. Millions of low-income babies die every year from preventable ills like dysentery, while heroic efforts go into maintaining yuppie zygotes in test tubes at the unicellular stage. This is the dread 'nightmare' of eugenics in familiar, marketplace form. which involves breeding the best-paid instead of the best. Cloning technology is an almost inevitable byproduct of in vitro fertilization. Once you decide to go to the trouble of in vitro, with its potentially hazardous megadoses of hormones for the female partner and various indignities for the male, you might as well make a few backup copies of any viable embryo that's produced. And once you've got the backup organ copies, why not keep a few in the freezer, in case Junior ever needs a new kidney or cornea? The critics of cloning say we should know what we're getting into, with all its Orwellian implications. But if we decide to outlaw cloning, we should understand the implications of that. We would be saying in effect that we prefer to leave genetic destiny to the crap shooting of nature, despite sickle-cell anemia and Tay-Sachs and all the rest, because ultimately we don't trust the market to regulate life itself. And this may be the hardest thing of all to acknowledge: that it isn't so much 21st century technology we fear, as what will happen to that technology in the hands of old-fashioned 20th century capitalism.We learn from the first paragraph that ______.A.nonreligious folks received cloning with open arms.B.the scientist was encouraged to popularize his ideas.C.some people moved strongly against cloning technique.D.a technician was condemned and sentenced to death.
A.
B.
C.
We
D.
A.nonreligious
E.
B.the
F.
C.some
G.
D.a
H.