未分类题

听力原文：W: So, which model do you prefer?
M: Well, I read some good reviews of the PC2010 several months ago, but I don't think it has enough memory space for me.
W: The XY200 is a little older, but can still do everything you need it to do. It has a big memory.
M: That's true, but I'm looking more at the K08. The catch there is price. It's a little more than I budgeted for.
W: What about it's specifications?
M: Well, it does everything I need it to do and more. It's a brand new model and the warranty is better than for the other two models.
W: I see that several programmes are included as part of a special offer. That could save you money overall.
M: I think you might be right there. Are you going to buy a laptop too?
W: If I get that job I applied for, I'll get one to use when I'm travelling around, so I'll just wait to see if I get that job.
M: Will they let you choose your own or will they just give you one that they have chosen?
W: I don't know. Anyway, if they give me one, I'm sure it'll be good enough to do every thing I need, for work at least.
M: OK, let's get the sales assistant.
(20)
A．It doesn't come with a guarantee, but shouldn't have any problems.
B．It is the newest computer they talk about.
C．It doesn't have the biggest memory.
D．If you buy it, you can get discounts on computer programmes.

A.
W:
B.
M:
C.
W:
D.
W:
E.
M:
F.
M:
G.
M:
H.
(20)
A．It
I.
B．It
J.
C．It
K.
D．If

【参考答案】

B
解析：此题考查从内容进行推测的能力。在做此题时，考生应该抓住It's a brand new model，就......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)

<上一题目录下一题>

热门试题

未分类题

You are a manager at Chennai & Co, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants. One of the partners has asked you to investigate and respond to a number of issues which have arisen with two different companies.(a) Delhi Co, a potential new client, is a privately owned and rapidly expanding company which currently operates below the audit threshold in the country in which it is based. The company’s management is currently considering having either a full audit or a limited assurance review of their financial statements. The partner would like you to assist the management of Delhi Co by writing a response to them in which you:(i) Explain the difference between an audit of historical financial statements and a limited assurance review. (4 marks)(ii) Discuss the relative advantages and disadvantages to Delhi Co of having an audit of their historical financial statements as opposed to a limited assurance review. (8 marks)Delhi Co was incorporated in 2005, with founder and chief executive Mr Nimesh Dattani as the sole shareholder. After a period of rapid growth, Delhi Co took out a ten-year bank loan facility in June 2007 to finance Mr Dattani’s ambitious expansion plans. This was supported by a further injection of financial capital in 2014 through a new issue of shares in the company. The shares were sold to Mr Robert Hyland, an ex-business partner of Mr Dattani. The sale gave Mr Hyland a 40% shareholding in Delhi Co. He has no involvement in the management of the company.Until recently Delhi Co operated with a small accounting department, comprising one full-time member of staff and one part-time employee. Due to the expansion of the company and Mr Dattani’s plans to expand the customer base internationally, it has been necessary to increase the size of the accounting function to include two new full-time members of staff. Both of the new recruits are part-qualified accountants and Mr Dattani has committed to sponsoring them through their remaining training and ACCA examinations.Required:Prepare the response to the management of Delhi Co as requested by the partner.Note: The split of the mark allocation is shown against each of the issues above.(b) The audit committee of another client, Mumbai Co, has asked the partner to consider whether it would be possible for the audit team to perform. a review of the company’s internal control system. A number of recent incidents have raised concerns amongst the management team that controls have deteriorated and that this has increased the risk of fraud, as well as inefficient commercial practices. The audit report for the audit of the financial statements of Mumbai Co for the year ended 31 March 2016 was signed a few weeks ago. Mumbai Co is a listed company.Required:In respect of the request for Chennai & Co to review Mumbai Co’s internal control systems: Identify and discuss the relevant ethical and professional issues raised, and recommend any actions necessary. (8 marks)

未分类题

Your firm has been asked to provide advice to Granada Ltd, and one of its shareholders, Maria. Maria wants advice on the tax consequences of selling some of her shares back to Granada Ltd. Granada Ltd wants advice on the corporation tax and value added tax (VAT) implications of the recent acquisition of an unincorporated business.Maria: – Is resident and domiciled in the UK. – Is a higher rate taxpayer and will remain so in the future. – Has already realised chargeable gains of ￡15,000 in the tax year 2015 16.Shares in Granada Ltd: – Maria subscribed for 10,000 ￡1 ordinary shares in Granada Ltd at par in June 2006. – Maria is one of four equal shareholders and directors of Granada Ltd. – Maria intends to sell either 2,700 or 3,200 shares back to the company on 31 March 2016 at their current market value of ￡12·80 per share. – All of the conditions for capital treatment are satisfied, except for, potentially, the condition relating to the reduction in the level of shareholding.Granada Ltd: – Is a UK resident trading company which manufactures knitwear. – Prepares accounts to 31 December each year. – Is registered for VAT. – Acquired the trade and assets of an unincorporated business, Starling Partners, on 1 January 2016.Starling Partners: – Had been trading as a partnership for many years as a wholesaler of handbags within the UK. – Starling Partners’ main assets comprise a freehold commercial building and its ‘Starling’ brand, which were valued on acquisition by Granada Ltd at ￡105,000 and ￡40,000 respectively. – Is registered for VAT. – The transfer of its trade and assets to Granada Ltd qualified as a transfer of a going concern (TOGC) for VAT purposes. – The business is forecast to make a trading loss of ￡130,000 in the year ended 31 December 2016.Granada Ltd – results and proposed expansion: – The knitwear business is expected to continue making a taxable trading profit of around ￡100,000 each year. – Granada Ltd has no non-trading income but realised a chargeable gain of ￡10,000 on 1 March 2016. – Granada Ltd is considering expanding the wholesale handbag trade acquired from Starling Partners into the export market from 1 January 2017. – Granada Ltd anticipates that this expansion will result in the wholesale handbag trade returning a profit of ￡15,000 in the year ended 31 December 2017.Required: (a) (i) Explain, with the aid of calculations, why the capital treatment WILL NOT apply if Maria sells 2,700 of her shares back to Granada Ltd, but WILL apply if, alternatively, she sells back 3,200 shares. (4 marks) (ii) Calculate Maria’s after-tax proceeds per share if she sells: (1) 2,700 shares back to Granada Ltd; and alternatively (2) 3,200 shares back to Granada Ltd. (4 marks) (b) (i) Describe the corporation tax treatment of the acquisition of the ‘Starling’ brand by Granada Ltd, if no charge for amortisation was required in its statement of profit or loss. (3 marks) (ii) Discuss how Granada Ltd could obtain relief for the trading loss expected to be incurred by the trade acquired from Starling Partners, if it does not wish to carry any of the loss back. (5 marks) (c) Explain the value added tax (VAT) implications for Granada Ltd in respect of the acquisition of the business of Starling Partners, and the additional information needed in relation to the building to fully clarify the VAT position. (4 marks)