问答题

2013年4月,甲公司因欠乙公司货款100万元不能按时偿还,向乙公司请求延期至2010年4月1日还款。并愿意以本公司所有的3台大型设备进行抵押和1辆轿车进行质押,为其履行还款义务提供担保。乙公司同意了甲公司的请求,并与甲公司订立了书面抵押和质押合同。甲公司将用于质押的轿车的机动车登记证书交乙公司保管,但未就抵押和质押办理任何登记手续,也未向乙公司交付用于抵押的设备和质押的轿车。2013年5月,甲公司将用于抵押的3台设备出租给丙公司,将用于质押的轿车出租给丁公司,租期均为1年。2013年8月,甲公司隐瞒有关事实,与戊公司订立合同出售其用于抵押的3台设备。随后,甲公司通知丙公司:本公司已将出租的3台设备卖给戊公司,要求解除租赁合同,丙公司可不再支付剩余9个月的租金,并请其将这3台设备交付给戊公司。丙公司表示同意,且立即向戊公司交付,这3台设备。2013年9月1日。甲公司再次隐瞒了有关事实,与乙公司订立合同出售其用于质押的轿车。双方办理了过户登记手续,并约定9月15日之前交付。甲公司在通知下公司向乙公司交付出租的轿车时,丁公司拒绝了甲公司的要求,并向甲公司主张同等条件下的优先购买权.9月30日,丁公司工作人员在驾驶该轿车时外出时,遭遇罕见泥石流,车毁人亡。2014年4月1日,甲公司仍无力向乙公司偿还货款。乙公司在调查了解甲公司资产状况得知:甲公司出资200万元设立的全资子公司庚经营状况良好,资金充裕;另外.庚公司欠甲公司到期货款150万元,尚未偿还。2014年4月15日,乙公司发函给庚公司,要求其偿还甲公司所欠本公司债务。
根据上述内容,分别回答下列{TSE}题:
{TS}甲公司是否有权将用于抵押的3台设备出租给丙公司?请说明理由。

【参考答案】

甲公司有权将用于抵押的3台设备出租给丙公司。根据规定,抵押权设定后,抵押物仍然归抵押人占有,因此抵押人有权将抵押物出租。


(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看答案解析 ↓↓↓)
热门 试题

单项选择题
Text 2 Marion Nesde's he8vyweight criticism against Coca-Cola and PepsiCo comes at an odd moment for the industry.Americans are drinking fewer sugary sodas-in 2012 production was 23%below what it had been a decade earlier.Even sales of diet drinks are losing their fizz,as consumers question.the merits of artificial sweeteners.From one angle,it would seem that health advocates such as Ms Nestle have won.Yet in America companies still produce 30 gallons of regular fizzy drinks per person per year.In many counLries,particularly developing ones,consumpLion is on the rise.Ms Nestle,a professor at New York Universily,is both inspired by recent progress and dissatisfied with it.That is no surlmse.Her first book,Food Politics,remains a bible for those who complain about the power of food companies.In her new book she atiacks the industry's most widely consumed,least healthy product.Soda Poluics,she says,is a book to inspire readers to action .As a rallying cry,it is verbose.When readers leam on page 238 that she will pick up a panicular subject in chapter 25,it is with no litde dismay that they realize they are only on chapter 17.But what the author wanis most is to craft a detailed guide to the producers'alleged violation,and how to stop them.Ms Nesde says she would have no complaint with sweet fizzy drinks if they were sipped occasionally,as a treat.However,for millions of people in many counUies,they are not.In Mexico companies sold 372 cans of fizzy drinks per person in 2012.About half of Americans do not dnnk them Rgularly,but those who do are disproportionately poor,less educaled,male,Hispanic or black.10%of Americans down more than four cans a day.Drinking a lot of sweet fizzy drinks is plainly unhealthy.Unlike a Big Mac,they have no nutritional value;nor do their calories satisfy hunger.One large study found that for each can added to a person's daily diet,the risk of diabeies jumped by 22%.There are also links beLween sugar and heart disease,stroke and cancer.Drinking lots of sodas imposes clear costs on individuals,Ms Nestle argues,but it has a broader cost,too.American taxpayers subsidize corn production and let the poor use government food vouchers to buy fizzy drinks.More important,taxpayers foot the health biU for those who develop chronic disease.According to the last paragraph,having too many soda drinks_____
A.canincreasetheriskofdeath
B.willinevitablyleadtodiabetes
C.maybringtheproblemofobesity
D.hassomethingtodowithcertaindiseases