未分类题

听力原文: A British study of how diet affects the health of new mothers and their babies produced the surprise finding that vegetarian women are more likely to have girls, one of the report's authors said yesterday.
In what is thought to be the first study of its kind, researchers at Nottingham University in central England found significant differences in the sex of babies born to vegetarian and meat and fish-eating women. They were examining the health conditions in vegetarian and non-vegetarian mothers, looking at things like hemoglobin levels, which show how much iron the mother has in her blood, and birth weights.
Altogether 5,942 pregnant women were involved in the study when they were booked in Nottingham's City Hospital during 2001. According to the researchers, vegetarian mothers were defined as pregnant women who avoided meat and fish. Nearly five percent were vegetarian among them, a total of more than 250 women.
The birth ratio in Britain is that for every 106 boys born there are 100 girls, that's pretty constant. In their sample group of vegetarians there were 81.5 boys born for every 100 girls.
To further test their surprise findings, they increased the sample number to what scientists called a 'statistically significant' level. The study was extended for a further six months so that the sex of more babies could be looked at. The results, covering around 150 more vegetarian women, were' just about exactly the same'.
The study also found that vegetarian mothers were less likely to smoke during pregnancy -- 10 percent did so, compared with 20 percent of meat-eaters.
(36)
A.Vegetarian women are more likely to have girls.
B.Non-vegetarian women are more likely to have girls.
C.Vegetarian women are more likely to have boys.
D.Vegetarian women are more likely to smoke during pregnancy.

A.B.
C.
D.5
E.
F.
G.
(36)
A.Vegetarian
H.
B.Non-vegetarian
I.
C.Vegetarian
J.
D.Vegetarian

【参考答案】

A
解析:短文开头第一句A British study…produced the surprise findin......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)
热门 试题

未分类题
No investment offers a better return than giving the children the best start in lifE.Research has shown that for every US $1 spent -I would say invested -- on early childhood programs, countries enjoy cost savings of US $7. That is a pretty spectacular return. But it should not be surprising. It should be obvious.Young children who receive good early care are less likely to die, get sick, fail in their school education or require remedial services. They will be able to support themselves and their families, push their societies forwards and help to break cycles of illness, deprivation and discrimination. Investing in early childhood plays a direct role in sustainable poverty reduction.By young, I mean from before birth until the child is established in school at about the age of eight, but the first three years -- including the pre-birth period -- are particularly vital. This is when mental and physical capacities are forming and gaining strength.UNICEF, the United Nations international Children's Emergency Fund, has long recognized the importance of these early years. More than half our program budget is devoted to early childhooD.But last year, we went one step further. We made integrated early childhood development one of our five priorities (alongside girls' education, immunization (接种), HIV AIDS and child protection).Progress in one area contributes to progress in others. Tackling deficiencies in iron and iodine (碘) will improve not just physical health, but long-term brain development. The children of a healthy, educated, secure mother will thrive, rather than simply survivE.Enhancing the role of fathers pays equal dividends (红利).We need to focus most intensely on the under-threes, looking for ways to strengthen families' ability to care for their children, increasing their access to good quality, basic services, promoting gender equality and reinforcing national policies.It also requires us to look at the health of women, because a young child's future is shaped by its mother's well-being before and during pregnancy.Which is NOT the reason for the early childhood investment?A.It plays an essential role in fighting against poverty constantly.B.Countries will save later costs by seven times the amount once investeD.C.Young children who receive good early care will thrive physically and mentally.D.Research has invested US $1 for each child and the countries have enjoyed the benefits.
A.B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Which
H.It
I.
B.Countries
J.
C.Young
K.
D.Research