未分类题

By any standard, money manager Malcolm Gissen has had a complicated relationship with risk over the past couple of years. After losing 62 percent in 2008, the Encompass Fund, which Gissen co-manages, gained a staggering 137 percent last year, cementing its reputation as one of the more volatile funds in the industry. 'Most mutual fund managers tend to invest for mediocre results. Their goal is to perform. in line with their benchmark,' says Gissen, whose returns--for better or worsen-have been anything but mediocrE.
Encompass is one of a small group of funds that have a 'go-anywhere' mandate (meaning they can invest in essentially any type of security), and Gissen wields that power freely. Late last year, for instance, his fund had about 20 percent of its assets in gold-related investments. Despite all that, Gissen's attitude toward risk is surprisingly straightforward: 'We don't like risk,' he volunteers.
This, of course, begs the question: What exactly constitutes a risky portfolio? 'When people think about risk.., they think, 'What's going to be the next AIG or the next Enron?'' says Chris Konstantinos, a portfolio risk manager at Riverfront Investment Group, a Virginia-based advisory firm. 'That's a really important risk, but it's not the entire side of the risk equation. It's just one piecE.'
Lately, the market has shone a light on an entirely different type of risk, one that's far more paradoxical and difficult to grasp. 'Sometimes the biggest risk you can have in your portfolio is not having enough risk,' says Konstantinos. 'And certainly since March of 2009, that's clearly been the casE.'
Advocates of this philosophy point to two main scenarios. In one, a traditionally safe asset class falls off, pulling the rug out from underneath investors who were overexposed to it. That's what many analysts expect will happen to bond investors once interest rates start creeping up. In the other, a risky type of investment takes off, leaving those who don't own it behind in a cloud of dust. That's what occurred when consumer discretionary stocks surged during last year's rebounD.
In both scenarios, the advantage goes to investors with portfolios that are traditionally seen as risky. The challenge, of course, is achieving the right balancE.Many investors can't stomach the swings associated with funds like Gissen's, but there's middle ground to be founD.'The right way to look at risk is to look at it from a portfolio construction perspective, which means that in a highly diversified portfolio, there's room for what's perceived as risky kinds of investments,' says Konstantinos.
Most managers tend to invest portfolio that ______.
A.has the highest value
B.doesn't contain too much risk
C.is more risky than any others
D.can get more returns

A..,
B.
Most
C.
A.has
D.doesn't
E.is
F.can

【参考答案】

B
解析:第一段倒数第二句提到.大部分的共有基金经理倾向于为普通的业绩投资,这说明他们不希望有太大的风险,故[B......

(↓↓↓ 点击下方‘点击查看答案’看完整答案 ↓↓↓)
热门 试题

未分类题
It is easy to see why forgiveness is typically regarded as a virtuE.Forgiveness is not always a virtue, however. Indeed, if I am correct in linking resentment to self-respect, a too ready tendency to forgive may properly be regarded as a vice because it may be a sign that one lacks respect for oneselF.Forgiveness may indeed restore relationships, but to seek restoration at all cost--even at the cost of one's very human dignity--can hardly be a virtuE.And, in intimate relationships, it can hardly be true love or friendship either the kind of love and friendship that Aristotle claimed is an essential art of the human lifE.If I count morality as much as anyone else (as surely I do), a failure to resent moral injuries done to me is a failure to care about the moral value in my own person (that I am, in Kantian language, an end in myself) and thus a failure to care about the very rules of morality. To put the point in yet another way: If it is proper to feel indignation when I see third parties morally wronged, must it not be equally proper to feel resentment when I experience the wrong done to myself? Morality is not simply something to be believed: it is something to be cared about. This caring includes concern about those persons (including oneself) who are the proper objects of moral attention.Interestingly enough, a readiness to forgive--or even a refusal to display resentment initially--may reveal a lack of respect not just for oneself by for others as well. The Nietzschean view, for example, is sometimes portrayed like this: There is no need for forgiveness because a strong person will never feel resentment in the first placE.Why? Because he is not so weak as to think that other people--even those who harm him--matter enough to have any impact on his self-respect. We do not resent the insect that stings us (we simply deal with it), and neither should we resent the human who wrongs us.Although there is something attractive and worth discussing about this view, most of us would probably want to reject it as too demeaning of other human beings and our moral relations with them. I shall thus for the present assume the following: that forgiveness is acceptable only in cases where it is consistent with self-respect, respect for others as responsible moral agents, and allegiance to the rules of morality, that is, forgiveness must not involve complicity or acquiescence (默认) in wrongdoings.Which of the following best states the main idea of the text?A.Too ready to forgive is no more a real virtue than an evil.B.The consistency between self-respect and forgiveness is important.C.Rules of morality may guide the correct use of forgiveness.D.Caring about others and oneself demands generous forgiveness.
A.Which
B.Too
C.
B.The
D.
C.Rules
E.
D.Caring