单项选择题

Text 3 The past five years have been a bad time to be a taxpayer in Europe.Across the continent,govemments have relied heavily on tax rises to cut budget deficits,increasing the total burden by almost 5%of GDP in France and Greece.But rather than raise taxes any further,many countries are startin8 to cut them.The European Commission reckons that the euro zone's tax-to-GDP ratio stabilised in 2013 and is now falliry;.In January France announced plans to cut payroll taxes by 30 billion.This month Italy unveiled income-tax cuts worth 10 billion for those earning less than 25,000 a year.This week Britain proposed tax cuts for most people on low or medium incomes.Ireland and Sptun are also planning tax cuts later this year.Lower taxes may be popular,but how are such giveaways being financed?Few countries have Lhe scope to borrow much more.The commission has criticised France and Spain for repeatedly missing their deficit-reduction targets,though it is not taking action agsunst them.Italy's high level of public debt,which hit 133%of GDP in 2013,has also landed it on the commission's fiscal"watch list".Instead,most countries plan to pay for their tax proposals with public-spending cuts.Italy says it will reduce spendirg by an extra 7 billion this year and save a further 2.2 billion thanks to lower yields on its debt-though these figures may prove optimistic.The politician8 hope that lower taxes will boost growth.As euro-zone countries cannot devalue or lower their own interest rates,tax cuts are one of the few ways of trimming business costs fast,says Guillaume Menuet at Citigroup.France and Italy both hope to improve their competitiveness by reducing the tax"wedge"between employers'costs and what workers actually take home.In 2012 this tax take reached nearly 50%of the payroll biU in France and Italy,against an OECD average of just 36%.Some economists doubt that cutting income tax,Italy's approach,is the best way forward.Instead,they favour slashing Europe's high employer-paid socild security charges,as France proposes to do.Ihis would directly lower labour costs,encouraging companies to hire extra workers as well as to increase their invesLmenl.That would aLso give a welcome boost to growth.
The author's attitude towards France's proposal seems to be_____

A.favorable
B.pessinustic
C.doubtful
D.biased
热门 试题

问答题
甲公司的财务经理在复核2014年度财务报表时,对以下交易或事项会计处理的正确性难以作出判断: (1)为减少交易性金融资产市场价格波动对公司利润的影响,2014年1月1日,甲公司将所持有乙公司股票从交易性金融资产重分类为可供出售金融资产,并将其作为会计政策变更采用追溯调整法进行会计处理。 2014年1月1日。甲公司持有乙公司股票共计300万股,其中200万股系2013年1月5日以每股12元的价格购入,支付价款2400万元,另支付相关交易费用8万元;100万股系2013年10月l8日以每股ll元的价格购入,支付价款1100万元,另支付相关交易费用4万元。 2013年12月31日乙公司股票的市场价格为每股l0.5元。甲公司估计该股票价格为暂时性下跌。 2014年12月31日,甲公司对持有的乙公司股票按照年末公允价值进行后续计量,并将其公允价值变动计入所有者权益。当日,乙公司股票的市场价格为每股10元。 (2)为减少投资性房地产公允价值变动对公司利润的影响,从2014年1月1日起,甲公司将出租厂房的后续计量模式由公允价值模式变更为成本模式,并将其作为会计政策变更采用追溯调整法进行会计处理。甲公司拥有的投资性房地产系一栋专门用于出租的厂房,于2011年12月31日建造完成达到预定可使用状态并用于出租。成本为8500万元。 2014年度,甲公司对出租厂房按照成本模式计提折旧,并计入当期损益。在投资性房地产后续计量采用成本模式的情况下,甲公司对出租厂房采用年限平均法计提折旧,出租厂房自达到预定可使用状态的次月起计提折旧,预计使用25年,预计净残值为零。在投资性房地产后续计量采用公允价值模式的情况下,甲公司出租厂房备年年末的公允价值如下:2011年12月31日,8500万元;2012年12月31日,8000万元;2013年12月31日,7300万元;2014年12月31日,6500万元。 (3)2014年1月1日。甲公司按面值购入丙公司发行的分期付息、到期还本债券35万张,支付价款3500万元。该债券每张面值l00元,期限为3年,票面年利率为6%,利息于每年年末支付。甲公司将购入的丙公司债券分类为持有至到期投资。2014年l2月31日,甲公司将所持有丙公司债券的50%予以处置,并将剩余债券重分类为可供出售金融资产。重分类日,剩余债券的公允价值为l 850万元。除丙公司债券投资外,甲公司未持有其他公司的债券。甲公司按照净利润的l0%计提法定盈余公积。 假定不考虑所得税及其他因素。 要求: (1)根据资料(1),判断甲公司2014年1月1日将持有乙公司股票重分类并进行追溯调整的会计处理是否正确,同时说明判断依据;如果甲公司的会计处理不正确,编制更正的会计分录。 (2)根据资料(2),判断甲公司2014年1月1日变更投资性房地产的后续计量模式并进行追溯调整的会计处理是否正确。同时说明判断依据;如果甲公司的会计处理不正确,编制更正的会计分录。 (3)根据资料(3),判断甲公司2014年12月31日将剩余的丙公司债券划分为可供出售金融资产的会计处理是否正确,并说明判断依据;如果甲公司的会计处理不正确,编制更正的会计分录;如果甲公司的会计处理正确。编制重分类日的会计分录。 (答案中的金额单位用万元表示)
单项选择题
Text 3 The past five years have been a bad time to be a taxpayer in Europe.Across the continent,govemments have relied heavily on tax rises to cut budget deficits,increasing the total burden by almost 5%of GDP in France and Greece.But rather than raise taxes any further,many countries are startin8 to cut them.The European Commission reckons that the euro zone's tax-to-GDP ratio stabilised in 2013 and is now falliry;.In January France announced plans to cut payroll taxes by 30 billion.This month Italy unveiled income-tax cuts worth 10 billion for those earning less than 25,000 a year.This week Britain proposed tax cuts for most people on low or medium incomes.Ireland and Sptun are also planning tax cuts later this year.Lower taxes may be popular,but how are such giveaways being financed?Few countries have Lhe scope to borrow much more.The commission has criticised France and Spain for repeatedly missing their deficit-reduction targets,though it is not taking action agsunst them.Italy's high level of public debt,which hit 133%of GDP in 2013,has also landed it on the commission's fiscal watch list .Instead,most countries plan to pay for their tax proposals with public-spending cuts.Italy says it will reduce spendirg by an extra 7 billion this year and save a further 2.2 billion thanks to lower yields on its debt-though these figures may prove optimistic.The politician8 hope that lower taxes will boost growth.As euro-zone countries cannot devalue or lower their own interest rates,tax cuts are one of the few ways of trimming business costs fast,says Guillaume Menuet at Citigroup.France and Italy both hope to improve their competitiveness by reducing the tax wedge between employers'costs and what workers actually take home.In 2012 this tax take reached nearly 50%of the payroll biU in France and Italy,against an OECD average of just 36%.Some economists doubt that cutting income tax,Italy's approach,is the best way forward.Instead,they favour slashing Europe's high employer-paid socild security charges,as France proposes to do.Ihis would directly lower labour costs,encouraging companies to hire extra workers as well as to increase their invesLmenl.That would aLso give a welcome boost to growth.According to the last paragraph,some economists______
A.preferItaly'sapproachtoFrance's
B.favourslashingemployers'salaries
C.agreetoreducethecostsofemployees
D.reckonthatcuttingtaxistheonlyway